» Articles » PMID: 5019998

Lick-shock Contingencies in the Rat

Overview
Date 1972 Jan 1
PMID 5019998
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hungry rats were allowed to lick an 8% sucrose solution and then one of four lick-shock contingency conditions was superimposed on the licking baseline. These conditions were: free-operant avoidance, free shock, punishment, and no shock. From highest to lowest response rates, the groups fell in the order-avoidance, no shock, free shock, and punishment. Lick rates adjusted rapidly to introduction and removal of the contingencies. Post-shock responding was lowest in the punishment condition and highest in the free shock condition. No method was found simultaneously to equate shock frequency and separate response rates for the three shock contingency conditions. Only small, or no, reductions in shock rate occurred over sessions under the free-operant avoidance schedule when the shock-shock interval was 10 sec but large reductions occurred when the shock-shock interval was reduced to either 1 or 2 sec.

References
1.
Kelleher R, Cook L . An analysis of the behavior of rats and monkeys on concurrent fixed-ratio avoidance schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959; 2:203-11. PMC: 1403957. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-203. View

2.
Davis H, McIntire R . Conditioned suppression under positive, negative, and no contingency between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(4):633-40. PMC: 1338659. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-633. View

3.
CAMP D, RAYMOND G, Church R . Temporal relationship between response and punishment. J Exp Psychol. 1967; 74(1):114-23. DOI: 10.1037/h0024518. View

4.
Teitelbaum P, DERKS P . The effect of amphetamine on forced drinking in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1958; 51(6):801-10. DOI: 10.1037/h0038460. View

5.
Catania A, Deegan J, Cook L . Concurrent fixed-ratio and avoidance responding in the squirrel monkey. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966; 9(3):227-31. PMC: 1338183. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-227. View