» Articles » PMID: 4613269

In-use Contamination of Intravenous Infusion Fluid

Overview
Journal Appl Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1974 Nov 1
PMID 4613269
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the 1970 to 1971 nationwide epidemic of septicemias caused by Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter agglomerans traced to intrinsic contamination of Abbott intravenous infusion products, 94 infusion systems manufactured by Baxter Laboratories were studied microbiologically and epidemiologically during hospital use. Intravenous fluid from 10 systems (11%) contained microorganisms, usually Staphylococcus or Bacillus species; one infusion was heavily contaminated with Klebsiella pneumoniae. No national epidemic organisms, E. cloacae or E. agglomerans (formerly Erwinia), were recovered, suggesting that during this period frequent contamination with these organisms was unique to Abbott's infusion products. Contamination in this study appeared to be extrinsic in origin (introduced during clinical use) and related to the duration of continuous intravenous therapy. Nine of 61 systems (15%) that had been used longer than 48 h were contaminated, whereas only 1 of 33 used less than 48 h (3%) contained microorganisms. This study and the recent national outbreak indicate that contamination of infusion fluid, both from intrinsic and extrinsic sources, must be recognized as an additional risk of intravenous therapy; however, a once-daily replacement of the delivery apparatus can significantly diminish this hazard.

Citing Articles

Real-world study of the leakage of two types of infusion bags in multicenter pharmacy intravenous admixture service (PIVAS).

Yin Y, Fu W, Liu W, Li F, Gong X, Liu D Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1273020.

PMID: 37869755 PMC: 10587401. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1273020.


Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine.

Goebel J, Steinmann J, Heintschel von Heinegg E, Hestermann T, Nassenstein K GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2019; 14:Doc05.

PMID: 31198659 PMC: 6545436. DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000321.


Leaving more than your fingerprint on the intravenous line: a prospective study on propofol anesthesia and implications of stopcock contamination.

Cole D, Baslanti T, Gravenstein N, Gravenstein N Anesth Analg. 2013; 120(4):861-7.

PMID: 23749446 PMC: 3833883. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318292ed45.


Open versus closed IV infusion systems: a state based model to predict risk of catheter associated blood stream infections.

Graves N, Barnett A, Rosenthal V BMJ Open. 2011; 1(2):e000188.

PMID: 22021881 PMC: 3191595. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000188.


Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?.

Rangel-Frausto M, Higuera-Ramirez F, Martinez-Soto J, Rosenthal V Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2010; 9:6.

PMID: 20122280 PMC: 2829484. DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-9-6.


References
1.
Sack R . Epidemic of gram-negative organism septicemia subsequent to elective operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 107(3):394-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90565-x. View

2.
STARR M, Chatterjee A . The genus Erwinia: enterobacteria pathogenic to plants and animals. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1972; 26:389-426. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.26.100172.002133. View

3.
Wilmore D, Dudrick S . An in-line filter for intravenous solutions. Arch Surg. 1969; 99(4):462-3. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1969.01340160042009. View

4.
Gelbart S, Reinhardt G, GREENLEE H . Multiplication of nosocomial pathogens in intravenous feeding solutions. Appl Microbiol. 1973; 26(6):874-9. PMC: 379925. DOI: 10.1128/am.26.6.874-879.1973. View

5.
Jones P . Thrombophlebitis following intravenous infusions; a review of its aetiology and prevention. Postgrad Med J. 1957; 33(383):444-7. PMC: 2501526. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.33.383.444. View