» Articles » PMID: 4570987

Degree of Immunity Induced by Killed Vaccines to Experimental Salmonellosis in Mice

Overview
Journal Infect Immun
Date 1972 Jan 1
PMID 4570987
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Killed vaccines, deoxycholate-extracted or heated, were shown to induce an effective degree of immunity which protected against death (100%), prevented extensive multiplication, and left the mice with low residual salmonella populations in spleen and liver after intravenous (iv) or intraperitoneal (ip) challenge with virulent Salmonella typhimurium. Protection was most effective against the ip challenge route and less effective against the iv route. A study of the kinetics of the population of bacteria in the spleens and livers of immunized animals showed that after ip challenge there was an initial reduction of 99% at 6 hr after challenge, maintenance of levels of less than 10(3) bacteria per organ, and a final population of 10(2) to 10(3) per organ at 21 days. With iv challenge, after an initial reduction of 90% at 6 hr, growth ensued to levels above 10(6) bacteria per organ until 8 days, followed by a steady decline yielding residual populations of 10(3) to 10(4) in some cases. Organ hypertrophy correlated with bacterial population. Morbidity was prevented (as measured by gain in body weight) by immunization against ip challenge but not against iv challenge. Killed vaccines protected by their ability to induce an immune state which reduced the initial challenge population, prevented extensive multiplication, yet allowed "cellular immunity" to develop due to response to the living challenge infection itself. The consequence was a low-level carrier state similar to that induced by recovery from sublethal virulent infection.

Citing Articles

Identification of Protective Antigens for Vaccination against Systemic Salmonellosis.

Bumann D Front Immunol. 2014; 5:381.

PMID: 25157252 PMC: 4127814. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00381.


Mouse models to assess the efficacy of non-typhoidal Salmonella vaccines: revisiting the role of host innate susceptibility and routes of challenge.

Simon R, Tennant S, Galen J, Levine M Vaccine. 2011; 29(32):5094-106.

PMID: 21616112 PMC: 3152302. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.022.


Host restriction of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium pigeon isolates does not correlate with loss of discrete genes.

Andrews-Polymenis H, Rabsch W, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Rosetti C, Adams L J Bacteriol. 2004; 186(9):2619-28.

PMID: 15090502 PMC: 387805. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2619-2628.2004.


Effect of dietary essential amino acid limitations upon the susceptibility to Salmonella typhimurium and the effect upon humoral and cellular immune responses in mice.

Petro T, Bhattacharjee J Infect Immun. 1981; 32(1):251-9.

PMID: 7012029 PMC: 350614. DOI: 10.1128/iai.32.1.251-259.1981.


Correlation of the duration and magnitude of protection against Salmonella infection afforded by various vaccines with antibody titers.

Angerman C, Eisenstein T Infect Immun. 1980; 27(2):435-43.

PMID: 6991415 PMC: 550784. DOI: 10.1128/iai.27.2.435-443.1980.


References
1.
GOWEN J, Stadler J . Specificity of vaccine-conferred resistance to Salmonella typhimurium in mice. J Infect Dis. 1967; 117(2):151-61. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/117.2.151. View

2.
Aserkoff B, Schroeder S, Brachman P . Salmonellosis in the United States--a five-year review. Am J Epidemiol. 1970; 92(1):13-24. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121175. View

3.
Venneman M, BERRY L . Experimental salmonellosis: differential passive transfer of immunity with serum and cells obtained from ribosomal and ribonucleic acid-immunized mice. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1971; 9(5):491-502. View

4.
Kenny K, Herzberg M . Antibody response and protection induced by immunization with smooth and rough strains in experimental salmonellosis. J Bacteriol. 1968; 95(2):406-17. PMC: 252033. DOI: 10.1128/jb.95.2.406-417.1968. View

5.
Collins F . Cross-protection against Salmonella enteritidis infection in mice. J Bacteriol. 1968; 95(4):1343-9. PMC: 315092. DOI: 10.1128/jb.95.4.1343-1349.1968. View