Staff Attitudes Towards the Care of the Critically Ill in the Medical Intensive Care Unit
Overview
Emergency Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
In an attempt to study the basis for conflict and tension surrounding decision making in ICU settings, a questionnaire was used to examine staff attitudes in a newly opened medical ICU in four major areas: (1) ethical issues; (2) decision-making process; (3) communications; and (4) emotional reactions of staff. All of the 36 house officers and 32 of 34 nurses (all RNs) completed the questionnaire. Results showed there was no monolithic nursing as opposed to physician position on any issue. Futhermore, professional role exerted a more profound influence on attitudes than gender or religious background. There was remarkable agreement between physician and nurse groups on ethical issues. However, nurses were less satisfied with the decision-making process and communication in the medical ICU and were more aware than physicians of their own and other's emotional reactions. The results suggested four ways to reduce tension in the medical ICU: (1) frankly recognize the inevitability of conflict and tension in a system where physicians have ultimate authority; (2) avoid perpetuating stereotypes; (3) maximize the continuity of physician care; and (4) maximize communication between and within professional groups.
Leibold A, Lassen C, Lindenberg N, Graf B, Wiese C Indian J Palliat Care. 2018; 24(1):9-15.
PMID: 29440799 PMC: 5801638. DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_128_17.
The collaborative autonomy model of medical decision-making.
Rubin M Neurocrit Care. 2013; 20(2):311-8.
PMID: 24233814 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-013-9922-2.
Gielen J, Van den Branden S, Broeckaert B Med Health Care Philos. 2009; 12(4):423-31.
PMID: 19629746 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-009-9217-8.
Brett A HEC Forum. 2002; 14(2):132-47.
PMID: 12141007 DOI: 10.1023/a:1020955614779.
Staff attitudes towards continuation of life-support in newborns with major congenital anomalies.
Hazebroek F, Smeets R, Bos A, Ouwens C, Tibboel D, Molenaar J Eur J Pediatr. 1996; 155(9):783-6.
PMID: 8874112 DOI: 10.1007/BF02002907.