» Articles » PMID: 4363248

Effect of Ionic Strength on the Binding of Sindbis Virus to Chick Cells

Overview
Journal J Virol
Date 1974 May 1
PMID 4363248
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sindbis virus can adsorb to chicken embryo fibroblasts in two different ways. "Loosely" bound virus can be washed off the cell with buffers of ionic strength 0.2 or greater, whereas "tightly" bound virus remains attached under these conditions. When Sindbis virus is adsorbed to chick cells at 4 C from a buffer of ionic strength 0.17, 40 to 50% of the adsorbed virus is loosely bound, the remainder tightly bound. Infection of chick cells by Sindbis virus has only small effects on the total amount of virus that can be bound to the cells. However, the amount of Sindbis virus that can be tightly bound declines rapidly beginning at 2 to 3 h after infection. By 7 h after infection, the amount of virus that can be tightly bound is only 10 to 20% of the amount bound to uninfected cells. The adsorption (and penetration) of virus at 37 C is most efficient at an ionic strength of 0.15 to 0.17; at this ionic strength most of the adsorbed virus is tightly bound. At higher ionic strengths the virus adsorbs poorly. At lower ionic strengths most of the virus is loosely bound. A second enveloped virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, has been studied for the purposes of comparison; its adsorption behavior differs from that of Sindbis virus.

Citing Articles

Stabilization and formulation of a recombinant Human Cytomegalovirus vector for use as a candidate HIV-1 vaccine.

Kumru O, Saleh-Birdjandi S, Antunez L, Sayeed E, Robinson D, van den Worm S Vaccine. 2019; 37(44):6696-6706.

PMID: 31548012 PMC: 6863464. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.027.


TRIM25 Enhances the Antiviral Action of Zinc-Finger Antiviral Protein (ZAP).

Li M, Lau Z, Cheung P, Aguilar E, Schneider W, Bozzacco L PLoS Pathog. 2017; 13(1):e1006145.

PMID: 28060952 PMC: 5245905. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006145.


Expression of the zinc-finger antiviral protein inhibits alphavirus replication.

Bick M, Carroll J, Gao G, Goff S, Rice C, MacDonald M J Virol. 2003; 77(21):11555-62.

PMID: 14557641 PMC: 229374. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.77.21.11555-11562.2003.


Adaptive mutations in Sindbis virus E2 and Ross River virus E1 that allow efficient budding of chimeric viruses.

Kim K, Strauss E, Strauss J J Virol. 2000; 74(6):2663-70.

PMID: 10684281 PMC: 111755. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.74.6.2663-2670.2000.


Selection of RNA replicons capable of persistent noncytopathic replication in mammalian cells.

Frolov I, Agapov E, Hoffman Jr T, Pragai B, Lippa M, Schlesinger S J Virol. 1999; 73(5):3854-65.

PMID: 10196280 PMC: 104163. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.73.5.3854-3865.1999.


References
1.
BURGE B, Pfefferkorn E . Isolation and characterization of conditional-lethal mutants of Sindbis virus. Virology. 1966; 30(2):204-13. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(66)90096-1. View

2.
Simon L, ANDERSON T . The infection of Escherichia coli by T2 and T4 bacteriophages as seen in the electron microscope. I. Attachment and penetration. Virology. 1967; 32(2):279-97. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(67)90277-2. View

3.
Waite M, Brown D, Pfefferkorn E . Inhibition of Sindbis virus release by media of low ionic strength: an electron microscope study. J Virol. 1972; 10(3):537-44. PMC: 356495. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.10.3.537-544.1972. View

4.
Darnell Jr J, Sawyer T . The basis for variation in susceptibility to poliovirus in HeLa cells. Virology. 1960; 11:665-75. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(60)90113-6. View

5.
Brown D, Waite M, Pfefferkorn E . Morphology and morphogenesis of Sindbis virus as seen with freeze-etching techniques. J Virol. 1972; 10(3):524-36. PMC: 356494. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.10.3.524-536.1972. View