» Articles » PMID: 4352866

The Significance of Abrupt Transitions in Lineweaver-Burk Plots with Particular Reference to Glutamate Dehydrogenase. Negative and Positive Co-operativity in Catalytic Rate Constants

Overview
Journal Biochem J
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1973 Jan 1
PMID 4352866
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Lineweaver-Burk plots for glutamate dehydrogenase, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase and several other enzymes show one or more abrupt transitions between apparently linear sections. These transitions correspond to abrupt increases in the apparent K(m) and V(max.) with increasing concentration of the varied substrate. 2. The generalized reciprocal initial-rate equation for a multi-site enzyme requires several restrictions to be put on it in order to generate such plots. These mathematical conditions are explored. 3. It is shown that the effective omission of a term in the denominator of the reciprocal initial-rate equation represents a minimal requirement for generation of abrupt transitions. This corresponds in physical terms to negative co-operativity followed by positive co-operativity affecting the catalytic rate constant for the reaction. 4. Previous models for glutamate dehydrogenase cannot adequately account for the results. On the other hand, the model based on both negative and positive co-operativity gives a good fit to the experimental points. 5. The conclusions are discussed in relation to current knowledge of the structure and mechanism of glutamate dehydrogenase.

Citing Articles

The kinetic mechanism of ox liver glutamate dehydrogenase in the presence of the allosteric effector ADP. The oxidative deamination of L-glutamate.

Hornby D, Aitchison M, Engel P Biochem J. 1984; 223(1):161-8.

PMID: 6149744 PMC: 1144276. DOI: 10.1042/bj2230161.


Protection of glutamate dehydrogenase by nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide against reversible inactivation by pyridoxal 5'-phosphate as a sensitive indicator of conformational change induced by substrates and substrate analogues.

Chen S, Engel P Biochem J. 1974; 143(3):569-74.

PMID: 4376949 PMC: 1168425. DOI: 10.1042/bj1430569.


Purification and regulatory properties of phosphoribulokinase from Hydrogenomonas eutropha H 16.

Abdelal A, Schlegel H Biochem J. 1974; 139(3):481-9.

PMID: 4369092 PMC: 1166312. DOI: 10.1042/bj1390481.


Isotope-dilution analysis of rate-limiting steps and pools affecting the incorporation of thymidine and deoxycytidine into cultured thymus cells.

Sjostrom D, Forsdyke D Biochem J. 1974; 138(2):253-62.

PMID: 4274611 PMC: 1166202. DOI: 10.1042/bj1380253.


The subcellular distribution and properties of aldehyde dehydrogenases in rat liver.

Tottmar S, Pettersson H, Kiessling K Biochem J. 1973; 135(4):577-86.

PMID: 4149764 PMC: 1165872. DOI: 10.1042/bj1350577a.


References
1.
Di Prisco G . Tyrosyl and lysyl residues involved in the reactivity of catalytic and regulatory sites of crystalline beef liver glutamate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry. 1971; 10(4):585-9. DOI: 10.1021/bi00780a007. View

2.
Frieden C . Glutamic dehydrogenase. I. The effect of coenzyme on the sedimentation velocity and kinetic behavior. J Biol Chem. 1959; 234(4):809-14. View

3.
Pinto P, NEWTON Jr W, Richardson K . Evidence for four types of erythrocyte glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from G-6-PD-deficient human subjects. J Clin Invest. 1966; 45(6):823-31. PMC: 292762. DOI: 10.1172/JCI105398. View

4.
Godinot C, GAUTHERON D . Regulation of pig heart mitochondrial glutamate dehydrogenase by nucleotides and phosphate: Comparison with pig heart and beef liver purified enzymes. FEBS Lett. 1971; 13(4):235-240. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(71)80543-4. View

5.
de Vijlder J, SLATER E . The reaction between NAD+ and rabbit-muscle glyceraldehydephosphate dehydrogenase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968; 167(1):23-34. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2744(68)90274-x. View