An "outside-in" Processing Strategy in the Perception of Form

Overview

Journal Percept Psychophys

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 1985 Sep 1

PMID 4088817

Authors

B Earhard

H Walker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

References

Banks W, Larson D, Prinzmetal W . Asymmetry of visual interference. Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(6):447-56. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213822. View

Pomerantz J . Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1983; 112(4):516-40. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.112.4.516. View

Lanze M, Weisstein N, Harris J . Perceived depth vs. structural relevance in the object-superiority effect. Percept Psychophys. 1982; 31(4):376-82. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202662. View

Bryden M . Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. Can J Psychol. 1960; 14:78-86. DOI: 10.1037/h0083169. View

Butler B, Merikle P . Selective masking and processing strategy. Q J Exp Psychol. 1973; 25(4):542-8. DOI: 10.1080/14640747308400376. View

Wolford G, Chambers L . Lateral masking as a function of spacing. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 33(2):129-38. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202830. View

Navon D . Do attention and decision follow perception Comment on Miller. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981; 7(6):1175-82. View

Weisstein N, Harris C . Visual detection of line segments: an object-superiority effect. Science. 1974; 186(4165):752-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.186.4165.752. View

Merikle P . Selective backward masking with an unpredictable mask. J Exp Psychol. 1974; 103(3):589-91. DOI: 10.1037/h0037175. View

10.

Banks W, White H . Lateral interference and perceptual grouping in visual detection. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 36(3):285-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206370. View

11.

Maurer D . The scanning of compound figures by young infants. J Exp Child Psychol. 1983; 35(3):437-48. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(83)90019-x. View

12.

Pomerantz J, Sager L, Stoever R . Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1977; 3(3):422-35. View

13.

Bryden M, Dick A, Mewhort D . Tachistoscopic recognition of number sequences. Can J Psychol. 1968; 22(1):52-9. DOI: 10.1037/h0082745. View

14.

Navon D, Norman J . Does global precedence really depend on visual angle?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983; 9(6):955-65. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.6.955. View

15.

Kinchla R, Wolfe J . The order of visual processing: "Top-down," "bottom-up", or "middle-out". Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(3):225-31. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202991. View

16.

White M . Order of processing in visual perception. Can J Psychol. 1976; 30(3):140-56. DOI: 10.1037/h0082056. View

17.

Treisman A, Paterson R . Emergent features, attention, and object perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984; 10(1):12-31. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.1.12. View

18.

Williams A, Weisstein N . Line segments are perceived better in a coherent context than alone: an object-line effect in visual perception. Mem Cognit. 1978; 6(2):85-90. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197432. View

19.

Enns J, Prinzmetal W . The role of redundancy in the object-line effect. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 35(1):22-32. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205921. View