» Articles » PMID: 4086411

Movement Suppression Time-out for Undesirable Behavior in Psychotic and Severely Developmentally Delayed Children

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1985 Jan 1
PMID 4086411
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of a movement suppression time-out, which involved punishing any movement or verbalization while a client is in the time-out area, were evaluated in four experiments. The first experiment examined the effects of a DRO procedure and movement suppression plus DRO in suppressing self-injurious behavior in a psychotic child in three different situations. In Experiment 2, the results of the previous experiment were replicated with two dangerous behaviors in a second psychotic child. In a third experiment, movement suppression plus DRO was compared with contingent restraint in reducing inappropriate poking behavior in two settings. The movement suppression procedure eliminated poking whereas contingent restraint had little effect. In the final experiment, movement suppression time-out alone was compared with exclusionary time-out alone and simple corner time-out alone. Self-stimulation occurred at high levels during the exclusionary and simple corner time-out procedures. Self-stimulation was either suppressed or reduced during movement suppression time-out. The movement suppression time-out procedure produced a larger reduction in the target behavior in all three children. The effectiveness of the movement suppression procedure was explained in terms of the suppression of self-stimulation while the time-out procedure was being applied.

Citing Articles

The association for behavior analysis international position statement on restraint and seclusion.

Vollmer T, P Hagopian L, Bailey J, Dorsey M, Hanley G, Lennox D Behav Anal. 2012; 34(1):103-10.

PMID: 22532734 PMC: 3089400. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392238.


Assessment and treatment of foot-shoe fetish displayed by a man with autism.

Dozier C, Iwata B, Worsdell A J Appl Behav Anal. 2011; 44(1):133-7.

PMID: 21541112 PMC: 3050478. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-133.


Self-stimulatory behavior and perceptual reinforcement.

Lovaas I, Newsom C, Hickman C J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(1):45-68.

PMID: 3583964 PMC: 1285951. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-45.


Recreating the scene: an effective way to provide delayed punishment for inappropriate motor behavior.

Van Houten R, Rolider A J Appl Behav Anal. 1988; 21(2):187-92.

PMID: 2458333 PMC: 1286110. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-187.

References
1.
Repp A, Barton L, Brulle A . A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983; 16(4):435-45. PMC: 1307902. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-435. View

2.
Favell J, McGimsey J, Jones M . The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978; 11(2):225-41. PMC: 1311295. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-225. View

3.
TYLER Jr V, Brown D . The use of swift, brief isolation as a group control device for institutionalized delinquents. Behav Res Ther. 1967; 5(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90050-2. View

4.
MOLDAVE K, Harris J, Sabo W, SADNIK I . Protein synthesis and aging: studies with cell-free mammalian systems. Fed Proc. 1979; 38(6):1979-83. View

5.
Solnick J, Rincover A, Peterson C . Some determinants of the reinforcing and punishing effects of timeout. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977; 10(3):415-24. PMC: 1311205. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-415. View