Choi Y, Kim K, Moon S, Jung G, Cha J, Yim H
Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1489039.
PMID: 39936112
PMC: 11810929.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1489039.
Vaknin D, Raz-Groman Z, Scheuer A, Sadeh T
Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1199039.
PMID: 37823076
PMC: 10562594.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199039.
Chocholackova M, Jurik V, Ruzickova A, Jurkovicova L, Ugwitz P, Jelinek M
PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0289079.
PMID: 37540668
PMC: 10403131.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289079.
Yanes D, Frith E, Loprinzi P
Eur J Psychol. 2021; 15(3):447-458.
PMID: 33680140
PMC: 7909183.
DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1767.
Shin Y, Masis-Obando R, Keshavarzian N, Dave R, Norman K
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 28(2):574-582.
PMID: 33201491
PMC: 8062363.
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01835-3.
Assessing Rhythmic Visual Entrainment and Reinstatement of Brain Oscillations to Modulate Memory Performance.
J Walti M, Woolley D, Wenderoth N
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020; 14:118.
PMID: 32765231
PMC: 7378394.
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00118.
Absence of posture-dependent and posture-congruent memory effects on the recall of action sentences.
Diez-Alamo A, Diez E, Alonso M, Fernandez A
PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0226297.
PMID: 31830104
PMC: 6907800.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226297.
The role of context in animal memory.
Roberts W
Learn Behav. 2019; 47(2):117-130.
PMID: 30945172
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-019-00380-x.
Reinstating verbal memories with virtual contexts: Myth or reality?.
Walti M, Woolley D, Wenderoth N
PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0214540.
PMID: 30925185
PMC: 6440692.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214540.
A Spatial-Context Effect in Recognition Memory.
Pacheco D, Sanchez-Fibla M, Duff A, Verschure P
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017; 11:143.
PMID: 28824391
PMC: 5541067.
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00143.
In a context of time: the impact of delay and exposure time on the emergence of memory context effects.
Bloch A, Vakil E
Psychol Res. 2015; 81(1):182-190.
PMID: 26427369
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0710-9.
The influence of partner-specific memory associations on picture naming: a failure to replicate Horton (2007).
Brown-Schmidt S, Horton W
PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e109035.
PMID: 25279672
PMC: 4184819.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109035.
Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.
Clark S, Gronlund S
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 3(1):37-60.
PMID: 24214802
DOI: 10.3758/BF03210740.
Context dependent memory in two learning environments: the tutorial room and the operating theatre.
Coveney A, Switzer T, Corrigan M, Redmond H
BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13:118.
PMID: 24127650
PMC: 3766034.
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-118.
Internal reinstatement hides cuing effects in source memory tasks.
Starns J, Hicks J
Mem Cognit. 2013; 41(7):953-66.
PMID: 23666645
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0325-6.
The context counts: congruent learning and testing environments prevent memory retrieval impairment following stress.
Schwabe L, Wolf O
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009; 9(3):229-36.
PMID: 19679758
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.3.229.
Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?.
Sahakyan L, Waldum E, Benjamin A, Bickett S
Mem Cognit. 2009; 37(4):464-76.
PMID: 19460953
PMC: 2881643.
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.4.464.
The effect of scene context on episodic object recognition: parahippocampal cortex mediates memory encoding and retrieval success.
Hayes S, Nadel L, Ryan L
Hippocampus. 2007; 17(9):873-89.
PMID: 17604348
PMC: 3615418.
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20319.
When is a failure to replicate not a type II error?.
Vasconcelos M, Urcuioli P, Lionello-DeNolf K
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007; 87(3):405-7.
PMID: 17575905
PMC: 1868583.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.10-07.
Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis.
Smith S, Vela E
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001; 8(2):203-20.
PMID: 11495110
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196157.
