» Articles » PMID: 4065155

The Reduction of Inter- and Intra-observer Variability for Defining Regions of Interest in Nuclear Medicine

Overview
Journal Eur J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 1985 Jan 1
PMID 4065155
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of region-of-interest (ROI) techniques to quantify data obtained in radionuclide images is commonplace. However, the reproducibility of quantitation due to inter- and intra-observer variations using particular methods of deriving ROIs is often not appreciated. We examined such variations in the results obtained by four independent observers of varying experience using four methods of depicting a ROI about an organ. The set of image data consisted of renal scans with varying target-to-background ratios, and the ROI facilities included two edge-detection methods. The results indicated that, once observers were experienced with edge-detection methods, a lower inter- and intra-observer variation could be achieved, although the technique of 'shrinking' a ROI about a subjectively chosen display level was reasonably satisfactory. In terms or reproducibility, the least satisfactory method of depicting a ROI was the commonly used manually guided 'bug' around arbitrarily chosen display levels representing the boundary of an organ.

Citing Articles

Fully automatic region of interest selection in glomerular filtration rate estimation from 99mTc-DTPA renogram.

Lin K, Huang J, Chen Y J Digit Imaging. 2011; 24(6):1010-23.

PMID: 21274591 PMC: 3222559. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9361-6.

References
1.
Goris M, McKillop J, Briandet P . A fully automated determination of the left ventricular region of interest in nuclear angiocardiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1981; 4(2):117-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF02552390. View

2.
Jackson P, Wilde P, Watt I, DAVIES E . An edge detection algorithm for use in radionuclide imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 1981; 6(1):33-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00257070. View

3.
Pizer S, Todd-Pokropek A . Improvement of scintigrams by computer processing. Semin Nucl Med. 1978; 8(2):125-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80036-1. View

4.
Bourguignon M, Douglass K, Links J, Wagner Jr H . Fully automated data acquisition, processing, and display in equilibrium radioventriculography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1981; 6(8):343-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00251335. View

5.
Slutsky R, Pfisterer M, Verba J, Battler A, Ashburn W . Influence of different background and left-ventricular assignments on the ejection fraction in equilibrium radionuclide angiography. Radiology. 1980; 135(3):725-30. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.135.3.7384462. View