Evaluation of an E-learning Platform Promoting Electronic Personal Health Record Competence: a Pilot Trial in Older Adults

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2025 Mar 16

PMID 40089697

Authors

Luis Perotti

Oskar Stamm

Drin Ferizaj

Michael Dietrich

Ilona Buchem

Ursula Muller-Werdan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Electronic personal health records (ePHRs) play a key role in the digitalization of healthcare, but older adults, often less familiar with digital tools, face access challenges. This study assesses the effects of an interactive, microlearning-based e-learning platform on improving older adults' ePHR competencies.

Methods: To examine the effects of e-learning platform use on competencies, a pilot trial was conducted with two study groups. One group consisted of young-old adults (YOA) aged 50 to 64 years, and the other of older adults (OA) aged 65 years and older. Participants were recruited via senior organizations and facilities, newsletters and an internal database. Both groups used the learning platform for one week. Participants' ePHR knowledge (12-item questionnaire) and usage skills (completion time for three ePHR tasks) were measured pre- and post-intervention on site. The intention to use (ITU) the ePHR was surveyed using a Technology Usage Inventory subscale. The usability of the platform was assessed using the System Usability Scale.

Results: Twenty-eight participants (mean age YOA = 56.86, OA = 75.15 years) completed the study, with more women in both groups (YOA: 78.57%, OA: 57.14%). Knowledge improved significantly in both groups: OA increased their median correct answers from 7.00 to 9.00 (p = .019, r = .63), YOA increased from 7.00 to 10.00 (p = .001, r = .86). Median task completion times also decreased for both groups: OA from 746.50 to 539.00 s (p = .002, r = .82), YOA from 487.00 to 351.00 s (p = .012, r = .67). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of knowledge (p = .125) or skill acquisition (p = .144). Across the entire population, median ITU scores decreased from 282.00 to 262.00 (p = .038, r = .39), indicating a reduced intention to use the ePHR, though no changes were observed within groups. The platform's usability scored a mean of 64.04, suggesting high marginal usability.

Conclusion: Both OA and YOA improved their ePHR competencies after using the learning platform, with no significant differences between groups. The findings suggest that e-learning can enhance ePHR competence in older adults, though improvements in platform usability are needed for wider application in future studies.

Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (registration number: DRKS00031730), registered on 20/04/2023-prospectively registered.

References

Tang P, Ash J, Bates D, Overhage J, Sands D . Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 13(2):121-6. PMC: 1447551. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2025. View

Ruhi U, Chugh R . Utility, Value, and Benefits of Contemporary Personal Health Records: Integrative Review and Conceptual Synthesis. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(4):e26877. PMC: 8120425. DOI: 10.2196/26877. View

Ronda M, Dijkhorst-Oei L, Rutten G . Reasons and barriers for using a patient portal: survey among patients with diabetes mellitus. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(11):e263. PMC: 4260081. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3457. View

Ford E, Hesse B, Huerta T . Personal Health Record Use in the United States: Forecasting Future Adoption Levels. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(3):e73. PMC: 4830902. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4973. View

Luo Y, Dozier K, Ikenberg C . Human-Technology Interaction Factors Associated With the Use of Electronic Personal Health Records Among Younger and Older Adults: Secondary Data Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(10):e27966. PMC: 8579218. DOI: 10.2196/27966. View

Tulu B, Trudel J, Strong D, Johnson S, Sundaresan D, Garber L . Patient Portals: An Underused Resource for Improving Patient Engagement. Chest. 2015; 149(1):272-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-2559. View

Mitzner T, Savla J, Boot W, Sharit J, Charness N, Czaja S . Technology Adoption by Older Adults: Findings From the PRISM Trial. Gerontologist. 2018; 59(1):34-44. PMC: 6326254. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny113. View

Nahm E, Zhu S, Bellantoni M, Keldsen L, Russomanno V, Rietschel M . The Effects of a Theory-Based Patient Portal e-Learning Program for Older Adults with Chronic Illnesses. Telemed J E Health. 2018; 25(10):940-951. PMC: 6677633. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0184. View

Dong Q, Liu T, Liu R, Yang H, Liu C . Effectiveness of Digital Health Literacy Interventions in Older Adults: Single-Arm Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e48166. PMC: 10365623. DOI: 10.2196/48166. View

10.

Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A . Social participation of older adults in Quebec. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005; 16(5):406-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF03324572. View

11.

Reynolds K, Pietrzak R, El-Gabalawy R, Mackenzie C, Sareen J . Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in U.S. older adults: findings from a nationally representative survey. World Psychiatry. 2015; 14(1):74-81. PMC: 4329900. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20193. View

12.

Kotsani M, Kravvariti E, Avgerinou C, Panagiotakis S, Bograkou Tzanetakou K, Antoniadou E . The Relevance and Added Value of Geriatric Medicine (GM): Introducing GM to Non-Geriatricians. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(14). PMC: 8304813. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143018. View

13.

Moore C, Carter R, Nietert P, Stewart P . Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011; 4(5):332-7. PMC: 3203750. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x. View

14.

Armstrong R . When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014; 34(5):502-8. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12131. View

15.

Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011; 1(2):100-7. PMC: 3043330. DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.72352. View

16.

Taha J, Czaja S, Sharit J, Morrow D . Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health. Psychol Aging. 2013; 28(4):1124-39. PMC: 5808915. DOI: 10.1037/a0033911. View

17.

Xie B . Improving older adults' e-health literacy through computer training using NIH online resources. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2012; 34(1):63-71. PMC: 3358785. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2011.07.006. View

18.

Lober W, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, Shinstrom S, Stolyar A, Kim E . Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007; :514-8. PMC: 1839577. View

19.

Price-Haywood E, Harden-Barrios J, Ulep R, Luo Q . eHealth Literacy: Patient Engagement in Identifying Strategies to Encourage Use of Patient Portals Among Older Adults. Popul Health Manag. 2017; 20(6):486-494. DOI: 10.1089/pop.2016.0164. View

20.

Logue M, Effken J . An exploratory study of the personal health records adoption model in the older adult with chronic illness. Inform Prim Care. 2013; 20(3):151-69. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v20i3.21. View