» Articles » PMID: 40087239

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics: Current Practice, Challenges and Opportunities - a Workshop Report

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dose modification of biologics has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) hosted the first US-based public workshop on TDM of biologics with contributions from a broad array of interested parties including healthcare providers, clinical pharmacologists, test developers, bioanalysis and immunogenicity scientists, health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) experts and regulators. The key insight was that despite a body of evidence to support TDM in certain therapeutic areas, there remain substantial challenges to widespread clinical implementation. There is a lack of consensus regarding the integration of TDM in clinical guidelines, and a lack of consensus on the cost-effectiveness of TDM; both factors contribute to the difficulty that healthcare providers face in obtaining reimbursement for TDM (both coverage of testing itself, and coverage of potential dosing modifications). The HEOR experts outlined alternative routes to obtaining reimbursement and suggested advocating for changes in coverage policies to promote TDM use in the clinic. Reaching alignment across policy makers, patients and advocacy groups, payers, and healthcare providers, on specific treatment settings where TDM will be clearly beneficial, was identified as an important step to advancing TDM implementation for the benefit of patients.

References
1.
Lesko L, Schmidt S . Individualization of drug therapy: history, present state, and opportunities for the future. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 92(4):458-66. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2012.113. View

2.
Garces S, Antunes M, Benito-Garcia E, da Silva J, Aarden L, Demengeot J . A preliminary algorithm introducing immunogenicity assessment in the management of patients with RA receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 73(6):1138-43. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203296. View

3.
Sofia M, Rubin D . Current approaches for optimizing the benefit of biologic therapy in ulcerative colitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016; 9(4):548-59. PMC: 4913335. DOI: 10.1177/1756283X16643242. View

4.
Bartelds G, Krieckaert C, Nurmohamed M, van Schouwenburg P, Lems W, Twisk J . Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up. JAMA. 2011; 305(14):1460-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.406. View

5.
Papamichael K, Chachu K, Vajravelu R, Vaughn B, Ni J, Osterman M . Improved Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Proactive Compared With Reactive Monitoring of Serum Concentrations of Infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15(10):1580-1588.e3. PMC: 5605429. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.03.031. View