» Articles » PMID: 40082947

Development of Sequential Winning-percentage Prediction Model for Badminton Competitions: Applying the Expert System Sequential Probability Ratio Test

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2025 Mar 14
PMID 40082947
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study developed a sequential winning-percentage prediction model for badminton competitions using the expert system sequential probability ratio test (EXSPRT), aiming to calculate the difficulty of each event within a match and establish the initial prior probability.

Methods: We utilized data from 100 men's singles matches (222 games) held by the Badminton World Federation (BWF) in 2018 to evaluate event difficulty across six models for each determining factor. For setting the initial prior probability calculation method, 30 men's singles matches (74 games) organized by the BWF in 2019 were randomly selected. The odds for these matches were obtained from www.oddsportal.com .

Results: The efficacy of the six models was assessed based on application rates (15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of the collected odds, with the initial prior probability reflecting 25% of the odds chosen owing to its superior validity.

Conclusions: This research yielded six sequential winning percentage prediction models capable of offering real-time predictions during matches in badminton competitions by leveraging EXSPRT. These models enhance spectator engagement and provide foundational data for developing similar prediction models for other sports. Future research should focus on developing a program to identify the most effective model among the six and implement it practically.

References
1.
Chen W, Jhou M, Lee T, Lu C . Hybrid Basketball Game Outcome Prediction Model by Integrating Data Mining Methods for the National Basketball Association. Entropy (Basel). 2021; 23(4). PMC: 8073849. DOI: 10.3390/e23040477. View

2.
Wunderlich F, Memmert D . The Betting Odds Rating System: Using soccer forecasts to forecast soccer. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0198668. PMC: 5988281. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198668. View

3.
Chicco D, Totsch N, Jurman G . The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is more reliable than balanced accuracy, bookmaker informedness, and markedness in two-class confusion matrix evaluation. BioData Min. 2021; 14(1):13. PMC: 7863449. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-021-00244-z. View

4.
Foody G . Challenges in the real world use of classification accuracy metrics: From recall and precision to the Matthews correlation coefficient. PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0291908. PMC: 10550141. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291908. View

5.
Crewther B, Potts N, Kilduff L, Drawer S, Cook C . Performance indicators during international rugby union matches are influenced by a combination of physiological and contextual variables. J Sci Med Sport. 2019; 23(4):396-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.10.011. View