Evaluation of the Surgical Informed Consent for Elective and Emergency Surgeries in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Saudi Arabia

Overview

Journal BMC Med Ethics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Ethics

Date 2025 Mar 13

PMID 40075388

Authors

Maryam Al-Meshkhas

Zahraa Alakrawi

Sumaiah Alrawiai

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Informed consent (IC) represents one of the fundamental rights of patients in healthcare. An essential aspect of the IC process is providing patients with equal access to information to enable them to make the right decisions. However, failure to obtain IC undermines patient autonomy, lowers patient satisfaction, increases risks, and negatively affects the patient's trust in healthcare providers. This study aims to evaluate the surgical informed consent (SIC) process from the patient's perspective both for emergency and elective surgeries in obstetrics/genecology in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This is a quantitative cross-sectional study. The study population included all hospitalized female patients who had undergone obstetric or gynaecological surgeries, from February 2021 to March 2021. The total sample size was 156 female patients.

Results: Most of the participants were married (96.2%) and unemployed (80.1%). The most performed surgery was caesarean Sect. (84%). Most of the patients were satisfied with their SIC experience which represents over 85%. No significant difference has been found between the elective and emergency surgeries. However, person-in-charge of SIC administration and the time provided to sign the IC were deemed to be significant predictors.

Conclusion: Based on the findings, it is recommended that physician take responsibility for the SIC administration rather than an unknown provider. It is also recommended to provide the patients with adequate time to understand the SIC. Furthermore, ensuring the availability of emotional support is critical for enhancing the patient experience.

Clinical Trial Number: Not applicable.

References

Schenker Y, Meisel A . Informed consent in clinical care: practical considerations in the effort to achieve ethical goals. JAMA. 2011; 305(11):1130-1. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.333. View

Zethof S, Bakker W, Nansongole F, Kilowe K, van Roosmalen J, van den Akker T . Pre-post implementation survey of a multicomponent intervention to improve informed consent for caesarean section in Southern Malawi. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(1):e030665. PMC: 6955547. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030665. View

Pathak S, Odumosu M, Peja S, McIntyre K, Selo-Ojeme D . Consent for gynaecological procedure: what do women understand and remember?. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 287(1):59-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2518-9. View

Lamb C, Wang Y, Lyytinen K . Shared decision making: Does a physician's decision-making style affect patient participation in treatment choices for primary immunodeficiency?. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019; 25(6):1102-1110. PMC: 6900116. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13162. View

Page A . Safety in surgery: the role of shared decision-making. Patient Saf Surg. 2015; 9:24. PMC: 4450485. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-015-0068-3. View

Ogburn T . Shared decision making and informed consent for hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 57(1):3-13. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000003. View

Lynn M . Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986; 35(6):382-5. View

Hammami M, Al-Jawarneh Y, Hammami M, Qadire M . Information disclosure in clinical informed consent: "reasonable" patient's perception of norm in high-context communication culture. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:3. PMC: 3930349. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-3. View

Driever E, Stiggelbout A, Brand P . Shared decision making: Physicians' preferred role, usual role and their perception of its key components. Patient Educ Couns. 2019; 103(1):77-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.004. View

10.

Leclercq W, Keulers B, Houterman S, Veerman M, Legemaate J, Scheltinga M . A survey of the current practice of the informed consent process in general surgery in the Netherlands. Patient Saf Surg. 2013; 7(1):4. PMC: 3804026. DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-4. View

11.

Weckbach S, Kocak T, Reichel H, Lattig F . A survey on patients' knowledge and expectations during informed consent for spinal surgery: can we improve the shared decision-making process?. Patient Saf Surg. 2016; 10:15. PMC: 4891841. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-016-0103-z. View

12.

Khan S, Karuppaiah K, Bajwa A . The influence of process and patient factors on the recall of consent information in mentally competent patients undergoing surgery for neck of femur fractures. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012; 94(5):308-12. PMC: 3954370. DOI: 10.1308/003588412X13171221591970. View

13.

Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M . The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 80(1):94-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. View

14.

Roscam Abbing H . Twenty year WHO principles of patients' rights in Europe, a common framework: looking back to the future. Eur J Health Law. 2014; 21(4):323-37. DOI: 10.1163/15718093-12341331. View

15.

Alrawiai S, Aljaffary A, Al-Rayes S, Alumran A, Alhuseini M, Hariri B . The OPTION Scale: Measuring Patients' Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020; 13:1337-1346. PMC: 7608000. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S273340. View

16.

Hall D, Prochazka A, Fink A . Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ. 2012; 184(5):533-40. PMC: 3307558. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.112120. View

17.

Teshome M, Wolde Z, Gedefaw A, Asefa A . Improving surgical informed consent in obstetric and gynaecologic surgeries in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: A before and after study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e023408. PMC: 6347859. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023408. View

18.

Peric O, Misic M, Tiric D, Penava N, Busic D, Tomic V . Patients' experience regarding informed consent in elective and emergency surgeries. Med Glas (Zenica). 2018; 15(2):179-185. DOI: 10.17392/957-18. View

19.

AlHaqwi A, Aldrees T, Alrumayyan A, Alfarhan A, Alotaibi S, AlKhashan H . Shared clinical decision making. A Saudi Arabian perspective. Saudi Med J. 2015; 36(12):1472-6. PMC: 4707404. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.12.13682. View

20.

Akgun M, Boz I . Women's decision-making processes and experiences of vaginal birth after caesarean birth: A phenomenological study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019; 25(6):e12780. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12780. View