Minimal Changes in Patella Height After Aseptic Revision from Unicompartmental to Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview

Journal Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2025 Mar 12

PMID 40072626

Authors

Marius J Ibach

Oscar Torney

Andreas M Halder

Daniel Schrednitzki

Christoph H Lohmann

Nils Meissner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: If revision of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is required, converting it to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the favored approach. However, worse functional outcomes after revision from UKA to TKA are reported compared to primary TKAs. One potential driver may be a decline in patella height, limiting knee flexion, and increasing patellofemoral stress. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess whether the patella height changes after revision from UKA to TKA.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 aseptic UKA to TKA revisions between 2015 and 2022 at a single medical center. True lateral radiographs were obtained before revision (T1), one week after revision (T2), and at the last follow-up (T3). Two orthopedic surgeons independently measured the modified Insall-Salvati ratio (mISR) at each time point. The mean age was 67 years, 67% were female, and the mean BMI was 32 kg/m². The mean follow-up was 1.5 years.

Results: The mean mISR was 1.59 ± 0.3 at T1, and 1.58 ± 0.2 at T2, respectively, with no significant difference between T1 and T2 (p = 0.72). At T3 the mean mISR was 1.52 ± 0.2, with no significant difference to T2 (p = 0.57). Overall, 24 patients (19%) experienced a patellar tendon shortening of ≥ 10%. For T3 measurements obtained beyond 6 months postoperatively the mISR decreased by 3% compared to T2 (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: While a subset of patients with revision UKA to TKA demonstrated notable patellar tendon shortening over time, the overall cohort did not show a clinically meaningful change. Although a statistically significant 3% decrease in the mISR emerged beyond six months, this subtle difference fell below the predefined ≥ 10% threshold. These findings suggest that while minor changes can occur, their clinical relevance remains uncertain, underscoring the need for further long-term investigation.

Level Of Evidence: III.

References

Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, Hujazi I, Pandit H, Khanduja V . Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Past, Current Controversies, and Future Perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018; 31(10):992-998. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625961. View

Parratte S, Ollivier M, Lunebourg A, Abdel M, Argenson J . Long-term results of compartmental arthroplasties of the knee: Long term results of partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(10 Suppl A):9-15. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.36426. View

Klasan A, Parker D, Lewis P, Young S . Low percentage of surgeons meet the minimum recommended unicompartmental knee arthroplasty usage thresholds: Analysis of 3037 Surgeons from Three National Joint Registries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 30(3):958-964. PMC: 8901519. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06437-7. View

Vasso M, Corona K, DApolito R, Mazzitelli G, Panni A . Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Modes of Failure and Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty. Joints. 2017; 5(1):44-50. PMC: 5672863. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1601414. View

Chawla H, van der List J, Christ A, Sobrero M, Zuiderbaan H, Pearle A . Annual revision rates of partial versus total knee arthroplasty: A comparative meta-analysis. Knee. 2016; 24(2):179-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.11.006. View

Murray D, Goodfellow J, OConnor J . The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(6):983-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b6.8177. View

Hansen E, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz S, Lonner J . Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Has Fewer Complications but Higher Revision Rates Than Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Study of Large United States Databases. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(8):1617-1625. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.004. View

Lee J, Kim H, Park J, Yang J . Inferior outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(11):3403-3418. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4909-3. View

Migliorini F, Bosco F, Schafer L, Cocconi F, Kammer D, Bell A . Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):985. PMC: 11610075. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08112-7. View

10.

Lombardi Jr A, Kolich M, Berend K, Morris M, Crawford D, Adams J . Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It as Good as a Primary Result?. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(7S):S105-S108. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.023. View

11.

Sun X, Su Z . A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018; 13(1):158. PMC: 6013960. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0859-1. View

12.

Jarvenpaa J, Kettunen J, Miettinen H, Kroger H . The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop. 2009; 34(5):649-53. PMC: 2903165. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0811-4. View

13.

Lunebourg A, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Abdel M, Argenson J . Are Revisions of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties More Like a Primary or Revision TKA?. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(11):1985-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.042. View

14.

Lee J, Tay M, Frampton C, Young S . Clinical and functional outcomes of TKA after HTO or UKA: a New Zealand Joint Registry Study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(9):4095-4100. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05302-9. View

15.

Kirschbaum S, Weynandt C, Fuchs M, Perka C, Gwinner C . Major Shortening of the Patellar Tendon During Septic Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Revision Using Static Spacers. J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37(9):1851-1857. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.082. View

16.

Meissner N, Halder A, Torney O, Preis A, Sina J, Schrednitzki D . No shortening of the patellar tendon during two-stage total knee arthroplasty revision using articulating spacers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(9):4437-4441. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05545-6. View

17.

Clark D, Mandalia V, Hughes A, Mitchell S, Bhattacharjee A, Eldridge J . Patella tendon length after patella arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 132(2):179-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1407-1. View

18.

Konrads C, Schreiner A, Cober S, Schull D, Ahmad S, Alshrouf M . Evaluation of patella height in native knees and arthroplasty: an instructional review. SICOT J. 2022; 8:36. PMC: 9397114. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2022037. View

19.

van Duijvenbode D, Stavenuiter M, Burger B, van Dijke C, Spermon J, Hoozemans M . The reliability of four widely used patellar height ratios. Int Orthop. 2015; 40(3):493-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2908-2. View

20.

Borrego Paredes E, Barrena Sanchez P, Serrano Toledano D, Puente Gonzalez A, Fornell Perez S, Domecq Fernandez de Bobadilla G . Total Knee Arthroplasty After Failed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Results, Radiologic Findings, and Technical Tips. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 32(1):193-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.035. View