Computational Evaluation of the Biomechanical Effects of Position Changes in the Femoral Neck System on Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fractures: an in Silico Study

Overview

Journal Front Bioeng Biotechnol

Date 2025 Mar 11

PMID 40066362

Authors

Xiang Zhang

Shenghang Zhang

Zhou Zhong

Wen Zhang

Zhongwei Xiong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the biomechanical advantages of the Femoral Neck System (FNS), improvements in postoperative complication rates have not been significant. This study evaluated the effects of different FNS positions on the biomechanical stability of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (FNFs) using finite element analysis (FEA).

Methods: Pauwels type III FNF models fixed with different FNS positions were constructed using various bolt lengths, bolt positions, and axis-bolt angles. Biomechanical parameters, including stiffness, maximum implant von Mises stress (MIVS), maximum interfragmentary shear stress (MISS), and maximum interfragmentary gap (MIG), were analyzed by simulating early postoperative weight-bearing. Entropy scoring was used to rank the performance of different fixation positions to determine the optimal FNS implantation position.

Results: Compared with that of the standard model, the biomechanical stability changed when FNS positioning was altered. Among all the evaluated parameters, MIG had the highest weight (60.04%). In the lateral view, fracture fixation was most stable when the bolt was rotated 5° anteriorly relative to the femoral neck axis (composite score = 0.87). However, stability was poorer when the bolt was rotated 9° inward relative to the femoral neck axis (composite score = 0.13).

Discussion: The MIG is an important biomechanical parameter for assessing the stability of different FNS positions when treating FNFs. Shortening the distance between the bolt and the subchondral bone, upward movement, external rotation, and anterior rotation of the bolt can help improve the stability of the FNS in the treatment of Pauwels III FNFs.

References

Zhong Z, Lan X, Xiang Z, Duan X . Femoral neck system and cannulated compression screws in the treatment of non-anatomical reduction Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023; 108:106060. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106060. View

Bonneau N, Baylac M, Gagey O, Tardieu C . Functional integrative analysis of the human hip joint: the three-dimensional orientation of the acetabulum and its relation with the orientation of the femoral neck. J Hum Evol. 2014; 69:55-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.12.013. View

Zhan S, Jiang D, Hu Q, Wang M, Feng C, Jia W . Single-plane osteotomy model is inaccurate for evaluating the optimal strategy in treating vertical femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024; 245:108036. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108036. View

Zhou X, Li Z, Xu R, She Y, Zhang X, Chen G . Comparison of Early Clinical Results for Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures. Orthop Surg. 2021; 13(6):1802-1809. PMC: 8523763. DOI: 10.1111/os.13098. View

Elliott D, Newman K, Forward D, Hahn D, Ollivere B, Kojima K . A unified theory of bone healing and nonunion: BHN theory. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(7):884-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.36061. View

Rajfer R, Carlson B, Johnson J . High-energy Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024; 32(7):e302-e312. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00720. View

Cha Y, Song J, Yoo J, Park K, Kim J, Park C . Improved control over implant anchorage under the use of the femoral neck system for fixation of femoral neck fractures: a technical note. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):621. PMC: 8278696. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04497-x. View

Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, Sommer C, Eberli U, Mueller D . Biomechanical Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System in Unstable Pauwels III Femoral Neck Fractures: A Comparison with the Dynamic Hip Screw and Cannulated Screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 31(3):131-137. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000739. View

Lewis G, Mischler D, Wee H, Reid J, Varga P . Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2021; 19(4):403-416. PMC: 8422380. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-021-00690-y. View

10.

Samsami S, Saberi S, Sadighi S, Rouhi G . Comparison of Three Fixation Methods for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: Experimental and Numerical Investigations. J Med Biol Eng. 2015; 35(5):566-579. PMC: 4609309. DOI: 10.1007/s40846-015-0085-9. View

11.

De Bruijn K, Den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G . Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(14):1266-72. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357. View

12.

Kale S, Chalak A, Vatkar A, Dey J, Mehta N, Das S . Limitations and Complications in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures with the Femoral Neck System: A Case Report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2024; 14(3):78-82. PMC: 10976553. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i03.4294. View

13.

Cheng C, Shoback D . Mechanisms Underlying Normal Fracture Healing and Risk Factors for Delayed Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019; 17(1):36-47. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-019-00501-5. View

14.

Sprague S, Slobogean G, Scott T, Chahal M, Bhandari M . Young femoral neck fractures: are we measuring outcomes that matter?. Injury. 2014; 46(3):507-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.020. View

15.

Bojan A, Jonsson A, Granhed H, Ekholm C, Karrholm J . Trochanteric fracture-implant motion during healing - A radiostereometry (RSA) study. Injury. 2018; 49(3):673-679. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.005. View

16.

Jung C, Cha Y, Yoon H, Park C, Yoo J, Kim J . Mechanical effects of surgical variations in the femoral neck system on Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture : a finite element analysis. Bone Joint Res. 2022; 11(2):102-111. PMC: 8882323. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2021-0282.R1. View

17.

Cha Y, Chung J, Jung C, Kim J, Lee J, Yoo J . Pre-sliding of femoral neck system improves fixation stability in pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):506. PMC: 10286416. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06631-3. View

18.

Rajnish R, Srivastava A, Rathod P, Haq R, Aggarwal S, Kumar P . Does the femoral neck system provide better outcomes compared to cannulated screws fixation for the management of femoral neck fracture in young adults? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. J Orthop. 2022; 32:52-59. PMC: 9118353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.05.007. View

19.

Moon J, Lee J, Hwang K, Yang J, Park Y, Park K . Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):7915. PMC: 9098555. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11914-1. View

20.

Siavashi B, Aalirezaei A, Moosavi M, Golbakhsh M, Savadkoohi D, Zehtab M . A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults. Int Orthop. 2015; 39(10):2069-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2881-9. View