» Articles » PMID: 40063121

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Heavily Calcified Aortic Valve Stenosis: a Multicenter Comparison

Overview
Date 2025 Mar 10
PMID 40063121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Heavy calcifications in severe aortic stenosis (AS) pose a major challenge in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Only a few studies have addressed the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THV) in this subgroup of patients.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the outcomes of the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve Evolut valve frame and the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV in this challenging patient population.

Materials And Methods: This was a multicenter registry including a total of 1513 patients with heavily calcified AS undergoing TAVR. The primary endpoint was the incidence and degree of paravalvular leak (PVL) after TAVR. Secondary endpoints were post-implant hemodynamics as well as clinical endpoints according to the VARC-3 definitions.

Results: The CoreValve Evolut R but not the Evolut PRO showed significantly higher rates of PVL compared to the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra (44.8% vs. 29.5% for mild PVL, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in ≥ moderate PVL between both groups (p = 0.399). The CoreValve Evolut R and Evolut PRO showed superior THV hemodynamics compared to the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra group. These findings were confirmed in a propensity score-matched analysis. There were no significant differences regarding short-term outcomes including permanent pacemaker implantation and all-cause mortality between the three groups.

Conclusion: In patients with severely calcified AS, both CoreValve Evolut PRO and SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV showed lower rates of PVL than the CoreValve Evolut R. The self-expanding CoreValve platform had superior post-implant hemodynamics than the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra system.

References
1.
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J . 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2021; 43(7):561-632. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395. View

2.
Kalogeropoulos A, Redwood S, Allen C, Hurrell H, Chehab O, Rajani R . A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:971762. PMC: 9719928. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.971762. View

3.
Popma J, Deeb G, Yakubov S, Mumtaz M, Gada H, OHair D . Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(18):1706-1715. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. View

4.
Mack M, Leon M, Thourani V, Makkar R, Kodali S, Russo M . Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(18):1695-1705. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. View

5.
Pibarot P, Hahn R, Weissman N, Arsenault M, Beaudoin J, Bernier M . Association of Paravalvular Regurgitation With 1-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3 Valve. JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2(11):1208-1216. PMC: 5710359. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3425. View