» Articles » PMID: 40055426

ALM Adjusted by BMI or Weight Predicts Adverse Health Outcomes in Middle-aged and Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2025 Mar 7
PMID 40055426
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of skeletal muscle in the prognosis of patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of different muscle-mass adjustment standards on adverse health outcomes in middle-aged and elderly T2DM patients. Retrospective cohort study. A total of 1,818 T2DM patients aged 50 years or older were included in this study. The cohort comprised 45.7% females, with a median age of 63 years. Variables closely correlated with total lean mass (TLM) and appendicular lean mass (ALM) were selected as adjustment indicators. The primary composite endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and fragility fractures. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk associated with each indicator, and phenotypic characteristics of high-risk patients were evaluated. During a median follow-up of 63 months, 436 patients reached the primary endpoint. ALM/BMI and ALM/weight were negatively correlated with adverse outcomes in both sexes, even after adjusting for confounding factors (males: ALM/BMI (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.996-0.999, P = 0.005) and ALM/weight (HR = 0.924, 95% CI = 0.864-0.987, P = 0.020); females: ALM/BMI (HR = 0.998, 95% CI = 0.996-1.000, P = 0.030) and ALM/weight (HR = 0.917, 95% CI = 0.860-0.978, P = 0.008), respectively). Individuals with lower ALM/BMI and ALM/weight have poorer metabolic status, greater fat accumulation, more complications, and a lower muscle-to-fat ratio. Our findings demonstrate that both ALM/BMI and ALM/weight can predict adverse health outcomes, suggesting their potential as practical, clinically relevant markers for sarcopenia in T2DM.

References
1.
Donini L, Busetto L, Bischoff S, Cederholm T, Ballesteros-Pomar M, Batsis J . Definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity: ESPEN and EASO consensus statement. Clin Nutr. 2022; 41(4):990-1000. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.11.014. View

2.
Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K . Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21(3):300-307.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. View

3.
Ilich J, Kelly O, Inglis J, Panton L, Duque G, Ormsbee M . Interrelationship among muscle, fat, and bone: connecting the dots on cellular, hormonal, and whole body levels. Ageing Res Rev. 2014; 15:51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.007. View

4.
Chen R, Armamento-Villareal R . Obesity and Skeletal Fragility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023; 109(2):e466-e477. PMC: 10795939. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad415. View

5.
Miljkovic I, Kuipers A, Cauley J, Prasad T, Lee C, Ensrud K . Greater Skeletal Muscle Fat Infiltration Is Associated With Higher All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Older Men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 70(9):1133-40. PMC: 4553718. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glv027. View