» Articles » PMID: 40053857

A Case of Intraoperative Arrest & Mobile ECMO

Abstract

Over the past two decades, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used to support critical patients with cardiac and respiratory failure who fail to respond to conventional management. In refractory cardiac arrest, ECMO can restore perfusion in patients who meet specific criteria designed to maximize survival benefit and good neurological outcomes. In recent literature, there is no report of mobile ECMO in a case of prolonged cardiac arrest with direct cardiac massage. We describe our experience with a 34-year-old man with multiple traumatic injuries following a motor vehicle collision. He was treated in a trauma center hospital in the same city as our center. He was initially in stable condition (spontaneous ventilation with FiO2 0.21, no vasoactive drugs, Glasgow 15, no acute kidney injury or other organ dysfunction). One week after admission, a retained left hemopneumothorax required surgical intervention, as previous drainage was ineffective. Computed tomography imaging was also concerning for parencyhmal injury by the thoracotomy tube. Intraoperatively, when the patient was placed in lateral position, he experienced cardiac arrest, presumed to be secondary to pulmonary embolism. After 18 min, we were asked to rescue this patient with ECMO, as he had no contraindications to support. After 81 min of advanced life support, including direct cardiac massage, return of spontaneous circulation was achieved seconds after ECMO was initiated. He was then transported to our hospital. The patient achieved a favorable neurological outcome (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 at 24 h) and was discharged after a 2 month stay. This case highlights the potential benefits of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ECMO in patients with refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest. In this case, proper ACLS and CPR allowed time for mobile ECMO support to be initiated from a remote center.

References
1.
Aubin H, Petrov G, Dalyanoglu H, Richter M, Saeed D, Akhyari P . Four-year experience of providing mobile extracorporeal life support to out-of-center patients within a suprainstitutional network-Outcome of 160 consecutively treated patients. Resuscitation. 2017; 121:151-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.08.237. View

2.
Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Gudzenko V, Qadir N, Singh S, Nsair A . Implementation and outcomes of an urban mobile adult extracorporeal life support program. JTCVS Tech. 2022; 12:78-92. PMC: 8987336. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.12.011. View

3.
Okubo M, Komukai S, Andersen L, Berg R, Kurz M, Morrison L . Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes for adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2024; 384:e076019. PMC: 10847985. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076019. View

4.
Hinkelbein J, Andres J, Bottiger B, Brazzi L, De Robertis E, Einav S . Cardiac arrest in the perioperative period: a consensus guideline for identification, treatment, and prevention from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023; 40(10):724-736. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001813. View

5.
Holmberg M, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian A, Sandroni C, Hsu C, Gardner R . Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: An updated systematic review. Resuscitation. 2022; 182:109665. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.12.003. View