Social Body Weight Norms: a Population-based Profile in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2025 Mar 5

PMID 40045236

Authors

Liliya Leopold

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Which body weight is considered ideal and socially accepted in modern societies? A widely held belief is that social body weight norms are strict and thin in Western societies. This belief is supported by empirical evidence drawn from samples that do not necessarily represent common views in the population.

Methods: This study presents a population-based profile of social body weight norms using survey data collected in 2019 in the United States (N = 1,390, ages 18 to 84), Germany (N = 4,285, ages 24 to 74), and the Netherlands (N = 2,040, ages 18 to 84). Norms were measured on a validated figure rating scale.

Results: In all study populations, male and female figures representing the range from normal weight to slight overweight were generally rated as ideal and neither too thin nor too heavy. Heavier norms were found in older people and men, and more often in the Netherlands than in Germany and the United States. People generally perceived social body weight norms as thinner than what actual ratings revealed. This perception bias was most pronounced in the United States.

Conclusions: These findings provide a population-representative baseline of social body weight norms and contradict the notion of a thinness norm.

References

Chooi Y, Ding C, Magkos F . The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2018; 92:6-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005. View

Stunkard A, Sorensen T, SCHULSINGER F . Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1983; 60:115-20. View

Rakhkovskaya L, Warren C . Sociocultural and identity predictors of body dissatisfaction in ethnically diverse college women. Body Image. 2015; 16:32-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.10.004. View

Burke M, Heiland F, Nadler C . From "overweight" to "about right": evidence of a generational shift in body weight norms. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 18(6):1226-34. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.369. View

Swami V, Frederick D, Aavik T, Alcalay L, Allik J, Anderson D . The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project I. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010; 36(3):309-25. DOI: 10.1177/0146167209359702. View

Garner D, Garfinkel P, Schwartz D, Thompson M . Cultural expectations of thinness in women. Psychol Rep. 1980; 47(2):483-91. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1980.47.2.483. View

Perkins J, Perkins H, Craig D . Misperception of peer weight norms and its association with overweight and underweight status among adolescents. Prev Sci. 2014; 16(1):70-9. PMC: 5690559. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-014-0458-2. View

Puhl R, Himmelstein M, Pearl R . Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity. Am Psychol. 2020; 75(2):274-289. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000538. View

Keel P, Forney K . Psychosocial risk factors for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2013; 46(5):433-9. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22094. View

10.

Kapteyn A, Angrisani M, Darling J, Gutsche T . The Understanding America Study (UAS). BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e088183. PMC: 11499792. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088183. View

11.

Luppino F, de Wit L, Bouvy P, Stijnen T, Cuijpers P, Penninx B . Overweight, obesity, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(3):220-9. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2. View

12.

Frederick D, Tylka T, Rodgers R, Pennesi J, Convertino L, Parent M . Pathways from sociocultural and objectification constructs to body satisfaction among women: The U.S. Body Project I. Body Image. 2022; 41:195-208. PMC: 9764838. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.02.001. View

13.

Rand C, Resnick J . The "good enough" body size as judged by people of varying age and weight. Obes Res. 2000; 8(4):309-16. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2000.37. View

14.

Frederick D, Tylka T, Rodgers R, Convertino L, Pennesi J, Parent M . Pathways from sociocultural and objectification constructs to body satisfaction among men: The U.S. Body Project I. Body Image. 2022; 41:84-96. PMC: 9812655. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.01.018. View

15.

Caliendo M, Gehrsitz M . Obesity and the labor market: A fresh look at the weight penalty. Econ Hum Biol. 2016; 23:209-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2016.09.004. View

16.

Jeong M, Zhang D, Morgan J, Ross J, Osman A, Boynton M . Similarities and Differences in Tobacco Control Research Findings From Convenience and Probability Samples. Ann Behav Med. 2018; 53(5):476-485. PMC: 6339836. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay059. View

17.

Bevelander K, Burk W, Smit C, van Woudenberg T, Buijs L, Buijzen M . Exploring the directionality in the relationship between descriptive and injunctive parental and peer norms and snacking behavior in a three-year-cross-lagged study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020; 17(1):76. PMC: 7296677. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-00977-w. View

18.

Leopold L . Ideal Weight and Weight Discrepancy: A Study of Life Course Trajectories and Intercohort Change in the Netherlands. Int J Public Health. 2024; 69:1606278. PMC: 10880023. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606278. View

19.

Watson L, Lewis J, Moody A . A sociocultural examination of body image among Black women. Body Image. 2019; 31:280-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.03.008. View

20.

Karazsia B, Murnen S, Tylka T . Is body dissatisfaction changing across time? A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2016; 143(3):293-320. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000081. View