» Articles » PMID: 40040894

The Interstitial Lung Disease Patient Pathway: from Referral to Diagnosis

Abstract

Background: Suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients may be referred to an ILD-specialist centre or a non-ILD-specialist centre for diagnosis and treatment. Early referral and management of patients at ILD-specialist centres has been shown to improve survival and reduce hospitalisations. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the ILD patient diagnostic pathway and prompted centres to adapt. This study investigates and contrasts ILD patient pathways in ILD-specialist and non-ILD-specialist centres, focusing on referrals, caseloads, diagnostic tools, multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting practices and resource accessibility.

Methods: Conducted as a cross-sectional study, a global self-selecting survey ran from September 2022 to January 2023. Participants included ILD specialists and healthcare professionals (HCPs) from ILD-specialist centres and non-ILD-specialist centres.

Results: Of 363 unique respondents from 64 countries, 259 were from ILD-specialist centres and 104 from non-ILD-specialist centres. ILD centres had better resource availability, exhibiting higher utilisation of diagnostic tests (median: 12 tests) than non-ILD centres (nine tests) and better access to specialist professions attending MDT meetings (median: six professions at meeting) in specialist centres than non-ILD centres (three professions at meeting). Transitioning to virtual MDT meetings allowed HCPs from other locations to join meetings in nearly 90% of all centres, increasing regular participation in 60% of specialist centres and 72% of non-ILD centres. For treatment of patients, specialist centres had better access to antifibrotic drugs (91%) compared to non-ILD centres (60%).

Conclusions: Diagnostic pathways for ILD patients diverged between specialist centres and non-ILD centres. Disparities in resource and specialist availability existed between centres.

References
1.
Zasada M, Harris J, Groothuizen J, Aroyewun E, Mendis J, Taylor C . Investigating the efficiency of lung multi-disciplinary team meetings-A mixed methods study of eight lung multi-disciplinary teams. Cancer Med. 2023; 12(8):9999-10007. PMC: 10166965. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5730. View

2.
Povitz M, Li L, Hosein K, Shariff S, Mura M . Implementing an interstitial lung disease clinic improves survival without increasing health care resource utilization. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 56:94-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2019.03.012. View

3.
Tikellis G, Corte T, Teoh A, Glaspole I, Macansh S, Holland A . Barriers and facilitators to best care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Australia. Respirology. 2021; 27(1):76-84. DOI: 10.1111/resp.14185. View

4.
Moor C, Wijsenbeek M, Balestro E, Biondini D, Bondue B, Cottin V . Gaps in care of patients living with pulmonary fibrosis: a joint patient and expert statement on the results of a Europe-wide survey. ERJ Open Res. 2019; 5(4). PMC: 6801215. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00124-2019. View

5.
Stanel S, Rivera-Ortega P . Present and future perspectives in early diagnosis and monitoring for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1114722. PMC: 9975385. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1114722. View