» Articles » PMID: 40032518

Coverage, Timeliness of Measles Immunisation and Its Predictors in Pakistan: an Analysis of 6.2 Million Children Enrolled in the Provincial Electronic Immunisation Registry

Overview
Journal BMJ Glob Health
Specialty Public Health
Date 2025 Mar 3
PMID 40032518
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Measles-related morbidity and mortality persists due to suboptimal and delayed vaccination, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries where more than 95% of global measles deaths occur. We evaluated the coverage, timeliness of measles vaccination and its predictors for children aged 12-23 months in Sindh, Pakistan.

Methods: We analysed immunisation data from Sindh Province's Electronic Immunisation Registry for 6.2 million children aged 12-23 months. We assessed vaccination coverage at specific ages, calculated timeliness using Expanded Programme on Immunisation-Sindh criteria and examined predictors for timely vaccination using Cox proportional hazard regression. Spatial mapping was used to identify zero-dose measles hotspots.

Results: Among 6 227 450 children aged 12-23 months, 80.6% received the first measles vaccine dose and only 58.1% of those vaccinated children aged 15-23 months received the second dose. Only 36.6% and 31.4% of children received measles-1 and 2 at the recommended age range (measles-1: 270-301 days; measles-2: 453-484 days). Subnational analysis identified 26.5% of Union Councils with ≥25% measles unvaccinated children. Children of educated mothers (≥11 years) compared with uneducated mothers had a higher timely measles vaccination likelihood (measles-1: HR=1.24; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.26; p=0.010 and measles-2: HR=1.19; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.21; p<0.001), while children who received the last vaccination at an outreach compared with a fixed site had a lower timely measles vaccination likelihood (measles-1: HR=0.91; 95% CI: 0.90 to 0.91; p<0.001 and measles-2: HR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.93 to 0.94; p<0.001).

Conclusion: Suboptimal and delayed measles vaccination coverage casts serious doubts on attaining measles elimination by 2030, as stated in the Immunisation Agenda. Continued high-level national commitment and implementation of targeted strategies are imperative to achieving global measles immunisation goals.

References
1.
Babirye J, Engebretsen I, Makumbi F, Fadnes L, Wamani H, Tylleskar T . Timeliness of childhood vaccinations in Kampala Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e35432. PMC: 3335141. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035432. View

2.
Tariq S, Niaz F, Afzal Y, Tariq R, Nashwan A, Ullah I . Pakistan at the precipice: The looming threat of measles amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1000906. PMC: 9720314. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000906. View

3.
Mangrio N, Alam M, Shaikh B . Is Expanded Programme on Immunization doing enough? Viewpoint of health workers and managers in Sindh, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008; 58(2):64-7. View

4.
Gelaye S, Yenit M, Baraki A . Rural Vaccination Coverage Among Children Aged 12-23 Months Was Higher Than the Urban Counterparts: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Pawi District, Ethiopia. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2021; 12:119-127. PMC: 7989052. DOI: 10.2147/PHMT.S299064. View

5.
Raghupathi V, Raghupathi W . The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995-2015. Arch Public Health. 2020; 78:20. PMC: 7133023. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-020-00402-5. View