On the Breathability of Epidermal Polymeric-Printed Tattoo Electrodes

Overview

Journal ACS Appl Electron Mater

Publisher American Chemical Society

Date 2025 Mar 3

PMID 40028656

Authors

Marina Galliani

Francesco Greco

Esma Ismailova

Laura M Ferrari

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Tattoo sensors offer many of the features of next-generation epidermal devices. They are ultrathin and conformable electrodes that have been shown to record high-quality biosignals from the skin. Moreover, they can be fabricated through large-area processing such as printing. Here, we report on printed poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) tattoo electrodes breathability. Epidermal devices require a breathable interface to ensure a physiological transepidermal water loss for reduced skin inflammation and discomfort of the user. In this work, we deeply examine the polymeric tattoo sensor's permeability properties with complementary experiments. By assessing the water permeance, the water-vapor transmission rate, and the impedance spectroscopy of polymeric tattoo electrodes, we show that they are intrinsically breathable, establishing a dry interface with the skin. The stability of such a dry interface is shown through the recording of muscle activity during sport when the sweat rate is much higher. While breathability is often hindered in conventional epidermal sensors, in PEDOT:PSS tattoo electrodes, it lies at the core of a stable sensor performance.

References

Taccola S, Poliziani A, Santonocito D, Mondini A, Denk C, Ide A . Toward the Use of Temporary Tattoo Electrodes for Impedancemetric Respiration Monitoring and Other Electrophysiological Recordings on Skin. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(4). PMC: 7915056. DOI: 10.3390/s21041197. View

Yang Y, Cui T, Li D, Ji S, Chen Z, Shao W . Breathable Electronic Skins for Daily Physiological Signal Monitoring. Nanomicro Lett. 2022; 14(1):161. PMC: 9362661. DOI: 10.1007/s40820-022-00911-8. View

Zhang Y, Zhang T, Huang Z, Yang J . A New Class of Electronic Devices Based on Flexible Porous Substrates. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022; 9(7):e2105084. PMC: 8895116. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105084. View

Duc C, Vlandas A, Malliaras G, Senez V . Wettability of PEDOT:PSS films. Soft Matter. 2016; 12(23):5146-53. DOI: 10.1039/c6sm00599c. View

Wang Y, Yin L, Bai Y, Liu S, Wang L, Zhou Y . Electrically compensated, tattoo-like electrodes for epidermal electrophysiology at scale. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(43). PMC: 7608837. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0996. View

Taccola S, Greco F, Zucca A, Innocenti C, de Julian Fernandez C, Campo G . Characterization of free-standing PEDOT:PSS/iron oxide nanoparticle composite thin films and application as conformable humidity sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013; 5(13):6324-32. DOI: 10.1021/am4013775. View

Seok M, Yoon S, Kim M, Cho Y . A porous PDMS pulsewave sensor with haircell structures for water vapor transmission rate and signal-to-noise ratio enhancement. Nanoscale Adv. 2022; 3(16):4843-4850. PMC: 9418886. DOI: 10.1039/d1na00180a. View

Chi Y, Jung T, Cauwenberghs G . Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: methodological review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012; 3:106-19. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2010.2084078. View

Spanu A, Mascia A, Baldazzi G, Fenech-Salerno B, Torrisi F, Viola G . Parylene C-Based, Breathable Tattoo Electrodes for High-Quality Bio-Potential Measurements. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:820217. PMC: 8983861. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.820217. View

10.

Tian G, Deng W, Yang T, Zhang J, Xu T, Xiong D . Hierarchical Piezoelectric Composites for Noninvasive Continuous Cardiovascular Monitoring. Adv Mater. 2024; 36(26):e2313612. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202313612. View

11.

Bora D, Dasgupta R . Various skin impedance models based on physiological stratification. IET Syst Biol. 2020; 14(3):147-159. PMC: 8687402. DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2019.0013. View

12.

Li H, Tan P, Rao Y, Bhattacharya S, Wang Z, Kim S . E-Tattoos: Toward Functional but Imperceptible Interfacing with Human Skin. Chem Rev. 2024; 124(6):3220-3283. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00626. View

13.

Miyamoto A, Lee S, Cooray N, Lee S, Mori M, Matsuhisa N . Inflammation-free, gas-permeable, lightweight, stretchable on-skin electronics with nanomeshes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017; 12(9):907-913. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2017.125. View

14.

Tian L, Zimmerman B, Akhtar A, Yu K, Moore M, Wu J . Large-area MRI-compatible epidermal electronic interfaces for prosthetic control and cognitive monitoring. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019; 3(3):194-205. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-019-0347-x. View

15.

Taylor N, Machado-Moreira C . Regional variations in transepidermal water loss, eccrine sweat gland density, sweat secretion rates and electrolyte composition in resting and exercising humans. Extrem Physiol Med. 2013; 2(1):4. PMC: 3710196. DOI: 10.1186/2046-7648-2-4. View

16.

Fang Y, Li Y, Li Y, Ding M, Xie J, Hu B . Solution-Processed Submicron Free-Standing, Conformal, Transparent, Breathable Epidermal Electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 12(21):23689-23696. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04134. View

17.

Wang Y, Lee S, Wang H, Jiang Z, Jimbo Y, Wang C . Robust, self-adhesive, reinforced polymeric nanofilms enabling gas-permeable dry electrodes for long-term application. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(38). PMC: 8463786. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2111904118. View

18.

Geddes L, Valentinuzzi M . Temporal changes in electrode impedance while recording the electrocardiogram with "dry" electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng. 1973; 1(3):356-67. DOI: 10.1007/BF02407675. View

19.

Searle A, Kirkup L . A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes. Physiol Meas. 2000; 21(2):271-83. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/21/2/307. View

20.

Ferrari L, Sudha S, Tarantino S, Esposti R, Bolzoni F, Cavallari P . Ultraconformable Temporary Tattoo Electrodes for Electrophysiology. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2018; 5(3):1700771. PMC: 5867059. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700771. View