Overlap of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded and Fresh-Frozen Matched Tissues for Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics

Overview

Journal ACS Omega

Publisher American Chemical Society

Specialty Chemistry

Date 2025 Mar 3

PMID 40028131

Authors

Erin M Humphries

Peter G Hains

Phillip J Robinson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Many liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) studies have compared formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues with matched fresh-frozen (FF) tissues to examine the effect of preservation techniques on the proteome; however, few studies have included the phosphoproteome. A high degree of overlap and correlation between the two preservation techniques would demonstrate the importance of FFPE tissues as a valuable biomedical resource. Our aim was to quantitatively compare the proteome and phosphoproteome of matched FFPE and FF tissues using data-independent acquisition LC-MS. Four organs from three rats were cut in half to produce matched FFPE and FF tissue pairs. Excellent overlaps of 85-97% for the proteome and 82-98% for the phosphoproteome were observed, depending on the organ type, between the two preservation techniques. Most of the unique identifications were found in FF with less than 0.3% being unique to FFPE tissues. Strong agreement between FFPE and FF matched tissue pairs was observed with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.93-0.97 and 0.79-0.87 for the proteome and phosphoproteome, respectively. Digestion efficiency was slightly higher in FFPE (92-94%) than in FF tissues (86-89%), and a search of a data subset for formaldehyde induced chemical modifications revealed that only 0.05% of precursors were unique to FFPE tissues. This suggests that with quality sample preparation methods it is not necessary to include formaldehyde induced chemical modifications when analyzing FFPE tissues. We attribute the lower number of identifications in FFPE tissues to inaccurate peptide quantitation, which resulted in a lower MS peptide load and tryptic peptide enrichment load. Our results demonstrate that both proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of FFPE and FF tissues are highly comparable and highlight the suitability of FFPE tissues for both proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis.

References

Gundisch S, Hauck S, Sarioglu H, Schott C, Viertler C, Kap M . Variability of protein and phosphoprotein levels in clinical tissue specimens during the preanalytical phase. J Proteome Res. 2012; 11(12):5748-62. DOI: 10.1021/pr300560y. View

Iwenofu O, Lackman R, Staddon A, Goodwin D, Haupt H, Brooks J . Phospho-S6 ribosomal protein: a potential new predictive sarcoma marker for targeted mTOR therapy. Mod Pathol. 2007; 21(3):231-7. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800995. View

Sprung Jr R, Brock J, Tanksley J, Li M, Washington M, Slebos R . Equivalence of protein inventories obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and frozen tissue in multidimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomic analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009; 8(8):1988-98. PMC: 2722776. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M800518-MCP200. View

Mueller C, Edmiston K, Carpenter C, Gaffney E, Ryan C, Ward R . One-step preservation of phosphoproteins and tissue morphology at room temperature for diagnostic and research specimens. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e23780. PMC: 3157466. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023780. View

Bortel P, Piga I, Koenig C, Gerner C, Martinez-Val A, Olsen J . Systematic Optimization of Automated Phosphopeptide Enrichment for High-Sensitivity Phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2024; 23(5):100754. PMC: 11087715. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100754. View

Li C, Sun Y, Yu G, Cui J, Lou Z, Zhang H . Integrated Omics of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020; 38(5):734-747.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.002. View

Gamez-Pozo A, Sanchez-Navarro I, Calvo E, Diaz E, Miguel-Martin M, Lopez R . Protein phosphorylation analysis in archival clinical cancer samples by shotgun and targeted proteomics approaches. Mol Biosyst. 2011; 7(8):2368-74. DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05113j. View

Schoffman H, Levin Y, Itzhaki-Alfia A, Tselekovits L, Gonen L, Vainer G . Comparison of matched formalin-fixed paraffin embedded and fresh frozen meningioma tissue reveals bias in proteomic profiles. Proteomics. 2022; 22(21):e2200085. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202200085. View

Baker C, Bruderer R, Abbott J, Arthur J, Brenes A . Optimizing Spectronaut Search Parameters to Improve Data Quality with Minimal Proteome Coverage Reductions in DIA Analyses of Heterogeneous Samples. J Proteome Res. 2024; 23(6):1926-1936. PMC: 11165578. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00671. View

10.

Zhu Y, Weiss T, Zhang Q, Sun R, Wang B, Yi X . High-throughput proteomic analysis of FFPE tissue samples facilitates tumor stratification. Mol Oncol. 2019; 13(11):2305-2328. PMC: 6822243. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12570. View

11.

Ostasiewicz P, Zielinska D, Mann M, Wisniewski J . Proteome, phosphoproteome, and N-glycoproteome are quantitatively preserved in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and analyzable by high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9(7):3688-700. DOI: 10.1021/pr100234w. View

12.

Chafin D, Theiss A, Roberts E, Borlee G, Otter M, Baird G . Rapid two-temperature formalin fixation. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e54138. PMC: 3548901. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054138. View

13.

Marchione D, Ilieva I, Devins K, Sharpe D, Pappin D, Garcia B . HYPERsol: High-Quality Data from Archival FFPE Tissue for Clinical Proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2020; 19(2):973-983. PMC: 7515636. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00686. View

14.

Vitorio J, Duarte-Andrade F, Pereira T, Melo-Braga M, Canuto G, Macedo A . Integrated proteomics, phosphoproteomics and metabolomics analyses reveal similarities among giant cell granulomas of the jaws with different genetic mutations. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022; 51(7):666-673. DOI: 10.1111/jop.13327. View

15.

Kroll J, Becker K, Kuphal S, Hein R, Hofstadter F, Bosserhoff A . Isolation of high quality protein samples from punches of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissue blocks. Histol Histopathol. 2008; 23(4):391-5. DOI: 10.14670/HH-23.391. View

16.

Baker A, Dragovich T, Ihle N, Williams R, Fenoglio-Preiser C, Powis G . Stability of phosphoprotein as a biological marker of tumor signaling. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11(12):4338-40. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0422. View

17.

Bekker-Jensen D, Bernhardt O, Hogrebe A, Martinez-Val A, Verbeke L, Gandhi T . Rapid and site-specific deep phosphoproteome profiling by data-independent acquisition without the need for spectral libraries. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):787. PMC: 7005859. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14609-1. View

18.

Skliris G, Rowan B, Al-Dhaheri M, Williams C, Troup S, Begic S . Immunohistochemical validation of multiple phospho-specific epitopes for estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) in tissue microarrays of ERalpha positive human breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 118(3):443-53. PMC: 3448371. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0267-z. View

19.

Holfeld A, Valdes A, Malmstrom P, Segersten U, Lind S . Parallel Proteomic Workflow for Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Tissue Samples Preserved by Different Methods. Anal Chem. 2018; 90(9):5841-5849. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00379. View

20.

Hulsen T, de Vlieg J, Alkema W . BioVenn - a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9:488. PMC: 2584113. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-488. View