» Articles » PMID: 40027304

Development and Validation of a Novel Combinational Index of Liquid Biopsy Biomarker for Longitudinal Lung Cancer Patient Management

Overview
Journal J Liq Biopsy
Date 2025 Mar 3
PMID 40027304
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Many cancer biomarkers such as the circulating tumor cells/microemboli (CTCs/CTM) have been reported significant associations with clinical outcomes. However, different biomarkers have different sensitivities and specificities for cancer types and cohort patients, and synergistic effects between certain biomarkers have also been observed, leading to the inaccurate, fluctuating, and even controversial results when multiple biomarkers are analyzed together. In this paper, a novel combinational index, P-score, was developed for monitoring and predicting the disease condition of lung cancer patients during follow-up visits.

Materials And Methods: There were totally 13 return patients with 54 blood samples involved in this study to examine the number of CTC and CTM. Information from one group of 7 patients including 27 blood samples with published clinical data was employed to develop while those from another group of 4 patients containing 14 blood samples with unpublished clinical data were used to validate the P score in prediction. Enumerations were based on immunofluorescent staining images. Distributions of CTC/CTM and their frequencies in stratified patients were carefully examined and analyzed the ROC curve and AUC value to develop the P score and P score-based prediction model.

Results And Conclusion: We found that the predictive power of P-score was not only comparable to the traditional cancer marker, in comparison with individual CTC/CTM, more false positives could be corrected by using P-score, thereby to improve the accuracy of analysis. From our preliminary validation tests, the prognosis and disease progression monitored longitudinally by P-score were further confirmed by clinical outcome data from physicians and its sensitivity was even better than those from individual biomarkers. We believe that this novel combinational indicator could be a promising tool to interpret clinical outcomes more accurately from multiple factors, particularly useful for the early prognosis and longitudinal monitoring in cancer patient management.

References
1.
Kern S . Why your new cancer biomarker may never work: recurrent patterns and remarkable diversity in biomarker failures. Cancer Res. 2012; 72(23):6097-101. PMC: 3513583. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3232. View

2.
Mayeux R . Biomarkers: potential uses and limitations. NeuroRx. 2005; 1(2):182-8. PMC: 534923. DOI: 10.1602/neurorx.1.2.182. View

3.
Hou J, Krebs M, Lancashire L, Sloane R, Backen A, Swain R . Clinical significance and molecular characteristics of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor microemboli in patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(5):525-32. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.3716. View

4.
Grunnet M, Sorensen J . Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011; 76(2):138-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.11.012. View

5.
Hou Q, Bing Z, Hu C, Li M, Yang K, Mo Z . RankProd Combined with Genetic Algorithm Optimized Artificial Neural Network Establishes a Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction Model that Revealed C1QTNF3 as a Biomarker for Prostate Cancer. EBioMedicine. 2018; 32:234-244. PMC: 6021271. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.010. View