Health Care Experiences of Individuals Accessing or Undergoing Fertilization (IVF) in the U.S.: a Narrative Review of Qualitative Studies

Overview

Journal Front Reprod Health

Date 2025 Feb 28

PMID 40017896

Authors

Summer K Peterson

Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson

Lauren Spigel

Isabel Morgan

Adriana Parker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: fertilization (IVF) is an increasingly common method of assisted reproduction given the high rates of infertility in the United States (U.S.). However, despite growing utilization of IVF technologies, there is little known about the experiences of those accessing or undergoing IVF, particularly among adults in the U.S. The aims of this review are to (1) explore how economic, emotional and physical health, and interpersonal relationships impact and are impacted by accessing or undergoing IVF, and (2) understand the role of healthcare providers and the healthcare system.

Methods: A narrative review was conducted to summarize the current literature and provide insight into potential channels for care improvement. Eligible studies were published in English from 2013 to 2024 which qualitatively evaluated experiences of individuals and couples accessing or undergoing IVF. Peer-reviewed publications were identified from three electronic bibliographic databases. Methodologic rigor was assessed by two reviewers who also abstracted data on the study's characteristics as they pertained to four domains: health systems, economic, interpersonal, and physical and emotional health. Among the 32 papers retrieved for review, 22 met inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis.

Results: The available literature suggests accessing and undergoing IVF can be positively and negatively influenced by health systems, economic, interpersonal, and physical and emotional health factors. Often an individual or couple experiences multiple factors that compound to create a complex situation. Health systems-related factors included physician interaction and challenges with information volume and processing. Economic challenges primarily pertained to financing IVF and navigating insurance coverage. Interpersonal factors related to changes in relationships with partners, family members, and friends due to IVF. Physical health concerns (e.g., pain) and emotional health concerns (e.g., sadness, stress) were also noted by all included papers.

Conclusions: Efforts to improve care experiences of adults accessing or undergoing IVF are urgently needed. The evidence base points to a need for provider sensitivity trainings, clinic-based intervention, and community education in both physical and virtual spaces.

References

Buechel J, Spalding C, Brock W, Dye J, Todd N, Wilson C . A Grounded Theory Approach to Navigating Infertility Care During U.S. Military Service. Mil Med. 2022; 189(1-2):352-360. PMC: 10824476. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac174. View

Leyser-Whalen O, Greil A, McQuillan J, Johnson K, Shrefffler K . 'Just because a doctor says something, doesn't mean that [it] will happen': self-perception as having a Fertility Problem among Infertility Patients. Sociol Health Illn. 2017; 40(3):445-462. PMC: 10241317. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12657. View

Perone H, Stump H, Herweck A, Levine H, Wong A, Carugno J . Trends in Social Media Topics During COVID-19 Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatments. Cureus. 2020; 12(10):e11049. PMC: 7676446. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11049. View

Jennings L, Gagliardi L . Influence of mHealth interventions on gender relations in developing countries: a systematic literature review. Int J Equity Health. 2013; 12:85. PMC: 4015705. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-85. View

Nachtigall R, MacDougall K, Davis A, Beyene Y . Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2011; 97(1):82-7. PMC: 3376004. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.019. View

Blakely B, Williams J, Mayes C, Kerridge I, Lipworth W . Conflicts of interest in Australia's IVF industry: an empirical analysis and call for action. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017; 22(4):230-237. DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1390266. View

Redshaw M, Hockley C, Davidson L . A qualitative study of the experience of treatment for infertility among women who successfully became pregnant. Hum Reprod. 2006; 22(1):295-304. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del344. View

LoGiudice J . A Narrative Analysis of the In Vitro Fertilization Experiences of Survivors of Sexual Abuse. Nurs Womens Health. 2022; 26(2):107-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2022.01.007. View

Bedrick B, Anderson K, Broughton D, Hamilton B, Jungheim E . Factors associated with early in vitro fertilization treatment discontinuation. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112(1):105-111. PMC: 7299162. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.007. View

10.

Vassard D, Lund R, Pinborg A, Boivin J, Schmidt L . The impact of social relations among men and women in fertility treatment on the decision to terminate treatment. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(12):3502-12. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des353. View

11.

Mac Dougall K, Beyene Y, Nachtigall R . Age shock: misperceptions of the impact of age on fertility before and after IVF in women who conceived after age 40. Hum Reprod. 2012; 28(2):350-6. PMC: 3670726. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des409. View

12.

Stewart L, Holman C, Hart R, Finn J, Mai Q, Preen D . How effective is in vitro fertilization, and how can it be improved?. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(5):1677-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.130. View

13.

Huffhines L, Coe J, Busuito A, Seifer R, Parade S . Understanding links between maternal perinatal posttraumatic stress symptoms and infant socioemotional and physical health. Infant Ment Health J. 2022; 43(3):474-492. PMC: 9177799. DOI: 10.1002/imhj.21985. View

14.

Sira N, McNeil S, Hegde A, Geistman K, Schwartz A . Infertility and Identity: A Closer Look Into Experiences of Emerging Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2023; 41(1):32-43. DOI: 10.1177/27527530231190386. View

15.

Gunderson S, Jungheim E, Kallen C, Omurtag K . Public reporting of IVF outcomes influences medical decision-making and physician training. Fertil Res Pract. 2020; 6:1. PMC: 7014742. DOI: 10.1186/s40738-020-00070-7. View

16.

Su T, Chen Y . Transforming hope: the lived experience of infertile women who terminated treatment after in vitro fertilization failure. J Nurs Res. 2006; 14(1):46-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387561.03823.8e. View

17.

Eisenberg M, Lathi R, Baker V, Westphal L, Milki A, Nangia A . Frequency of the male infertility evaluation: data from the national survey of family growth. J Urol. 2012; 189(3):1030-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.239. View

18.

Ozturk R, Herbell K, Morton J, Bloom T . "The worst time of my life": Treatment-related stress and unmet needs of women living with infertility. J Community Psychol. 2021; 49(5):1121-1133. PMC: 8324009. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22527. View

19.

Cristancho S, Goldszmidt M, Lingard L, Watling C . Qualitative research essentials for medical education. Singapore Med J. 2018; 59(12):622-627. PMC: 6301871. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2018093. View

20.

Hjelmstedt A, Widstrom A, Wramsby H, Collins A . Emotional adaptation following successful in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(5):1254-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.061. View