Optimizing Patient Autonomy: a Discrete Choice Experiment on Preferences and Disparities in Healthcare Provider Selection

Overview

Journal Health Res Policy Syst

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2025 Feb 26

PMID 40012077

Authors

Gideon Leibner

Shuli Brammli-Greenberg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: In 2023, Israel introduced a legislative reform that, according to the Israeli Ministry of Health, aims to improve transparency and expand options for healthcare providers. This reform seeks to enhance patient choice, improve service quality and accessibility, foster competition and strengthen the public health system. The goals also include empowering patients to fully exercise their rights and make more informed healthcare decisions.

Objectives: This study explores public preferences regarding hospital choice before the 2023 reform, evaluates the relative importance of key hospital attributes influencing decision-making, assuming a baseline of high-quality care and analyses how these preferences vary across demographic and socio-economic groups.

Methods: Utilizing a discrete choice experiment involving 2117 participants, this study quantifies preferences for different hospital attributes, including hospital type, geographical location, and appointment availability. The study design incorporates attributes identified through a literature review and expert interviews, optimized to estimate trade-offs between attribute levels.

Results: Findings indicate a strong preference for shorter waiting times and proximity to specialized services. Significant disparities emerge among respondents, particularly between those with public versus additional voluntary insurance coverage and across population groups (i.e. Arabs and Jews). A notable proportion of Arab respondents preferred the existing hospital choice regime over any suggested attribute combinations.

Conclusions: While legislative reforms are designed to enhance patient involvement in decision-making, substantial gaps remain between policy intentions and actual public preferences. Although increased autonomy and choice empower patients, they can also introduce challenges, such as decision fatigue and the consumer paradox, potentially undermining reform effectiveness. Our findings underscore the need for more nuanced, patient-centred health policy approaches. Future research should focus on strategies that better address the diverse needs and preferences of the population, ultimately enhancing healthcare system efficiency and equity.

References

Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J . Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev. 2016; 74(4):379-403. PMC: 5502904. DOI: 10.1177/1077558716654631. View

Cooper Z, Gibbons S, Jones S, McGuire A . Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence from the English NHS Patient Choice Reforms. Econ J (London). 2015; 121(554):F228-F260. PMC: 4373154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02449.x. View

Keating N, Kouri E, He Y, Freedman R, Volya R, Zaslavsky A . Location Isn't Everything: Proximity, Hospital Characteristics, Choice of Hospital, and Disparities for Breast Cancer Surgery Patients. Health Serv Res. 2016; 51(4):1561-83. PMC: 4946041. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12443. View

Trottmann M, Stam P, Visser J, Brammli-Greenberg S . Balancing between competition and regulation in healthcare markets. Health Econ Policy Law. 2023; :1-10. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133123000312. View

Lane P, Lindquist J . Hospital choice: a summary of the key empirical and hypothetical findings of the 1980s. J Health Care Mark. 1988; 8(4):5-20. View

Berkowitz E, Flexner W . The market for health services: is there a non-traditional consumer?. J Health Care Mark. 1980; 1(1):25-34. View

Vrangbaek K, Robertson R, Winblad U, van de Bovenkamp H, Dixon A . Choice policies in Northern European health systems. Health Econ Policy Law. 2012; 7(1):47-71. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133111000302. View

Lendado T, Bitew S, Elias F, Samuel S, Assele D, Asefa M . Effect of hospital attributes on patient preference among outpatient attendants in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: discrete choice experiment study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):661. PMC: 9110630. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07874-x. View

Ryan M, McIntosh E, Dean T, Old P . Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care: the case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight. J Public Health Med. 2000; 22(2):202-10. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.202. View

10.

Shen Y . The effect of financial pressure on the quality of care in hospitals. J Health Econ. 2003; 22(2):243-69. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00124-8. View

11.

Moscelli G, Siciliani L, Gutacker N, Cookson R . Socioeconomic inequality of access to healthcare: Does choice explain the gradient?. J Health Econ. 2017; 57:290-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.06.005. View

12.

Rosen B, Waitzberg R, Merkur S . Israel: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit. 2016; 17(6):1-212. View

13.

. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1946; 36(11):1315-23. PMC: 1625885. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.36.11.1315. View

14.

Taylor S, Capella L . Hospital outshopping: determinant attributes and hospital choice. Health Care Manage Rev. 1996; 21(4):33-44. DOI: 10.1097/00004010-199602140-00005. View

15.

de Bekker-Grob E, Ryan M, Gerard K . Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012; 21(2):145-72. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1697. View