The Development of Media Truth Discernment and Fake News Detection is Related to the Development of Reasoning During Adolescence

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2025 Feb 26

PMID 40011547

Authors

Marine Lemaire

Steeven Ye

Lorna Le Stanc

Gregoire Borst

Mathieu Cassotti

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The spread of online fake news is emerging as a major threat to human society and democracy. Previous studies have investigated media truth discernment among adults but not among adolescents. Adolescents might face a greater risk of believing fake news, particularly fake news that is shared via social media, because of their vulnerabilities in terms of reasoning. In the present study, we investigated (1) the development of media truth discernment and the illusory truth effect from adolescence to adulthood and (2) whether the development of media truth discernment and the illusory truth effect are related to the development of reasoning ability. To accomplish this task, we recruited 432 adolescents aged 11 to 14 years as well as 132 adults. Participants were asked to rate the perceived accuracy of both real and fake news headlines. Participants were exposed to half of the news items before entering the rating phase. Finally, participants completed the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT). Media truth discernment (i.e., the difference between participants' ratings of fake and real news) developed linearly with increasing age, and participants rated familiarized headlines as more accurate than novel headlines at all ages (i.e., the illusory truth effect). Finally, media truth development (but not the illusory truth effect) was related to the development of reasoning abilities with increasing age. Our findings highlight the urgent need to improve logical thinking among adolescents to help them detect fake news online.

References

Guess A, Nagler J, Tucker J . Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci Adv. 2019; 5(1):eaau4586. PMC: 6326755. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. View

Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek S, de Graaf K, Larson H . Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(3):337-348. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. View

De Neys W, Feremans V . Development of heuristic bias detection in elementary school. Dev Psychol. 2012; 49(2):258-69. DOI: 10.1037/a0028320. View

Calvillo D, Smelter T . An initial accuracy focus reduces the effect of prior exposure on perceived accuracy of news headlines. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020; 5(1):55. PMC: 7644737. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-020-00257-y. View

Fazio L, Brashier N, Payne B, Marsh E . Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015; 144(5):993-1002. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000098. View

Pennycook G, Cannon T, Rand D . Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018; 147(12):1865-1880. PMC: 6279465. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000465. View

Young A, Shtulman A . How Children's Cognitive Reflection Shapes Their Science Understanding. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1247. PMC: 7326817. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01247. View

Fazio L, Sherry C . The Effect of Repetition on Truth Judgments Across Development. Psychol Sci. 2020; 31(9):1150-1160. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620939534. View

De Keersmaecker J, Dunning D, Pennycook G, Rand D, Sanchez C, Unkelbach C . Investigating the Robustness of the Illusory Truth Effect Across Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Cognitive Style. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019; 46(2):204-215. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219853844. View

10.

Henderson E, Westwood S, Simons D . A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 29(3):1065-1088. PMC: 9166874. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01995-w. View

11.

Brashier N, Marsh E . Judging Truth. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019; 71:499-515. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807. View

12.

Brashier N, Eliseev E, Marsh E . An initial accuracy focus prevents illusory truth. Cognition. 2019; 194:104054. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104054. View

13.

Pennycook G, Epstein Z, Mosleh M, Arechar A, Eckles D, Rand D . Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature. 2021; 592(7855):590-595. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. View

14.

Kokis J, Macpherson R, Toplak M, West R, Stanovich K . Heuristic and analytic processing: age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002; 83(1):26-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00121-2. View

15.

Ng L, Cruickshank I, Carley K . Cross-platform information spread during the January 6th capitol riots. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022; 12(1):133. PMC: 9461432. DOI: 10.1007/s13278-022-00937-1. View

16.

Pennycook G, Rand D . The Psychology of Fake News. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021; 25(5):388-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. View

17.

Pennycook G, Rand D . Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2018; 188:39-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. View

18.

Grinberg N, Joseph K, Friedland L, Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D . Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science. 2019; 363(6425):374-378. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau2706. View

19.

Unkelbach C . Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(1):219-30. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219. View

20.

Bago B, Rand D, Pennycook G . Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020; 149(8):1608-1613. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000729. View