» Articles » PMID: 40008045

Dietary and Environmental Factors Affecting the Dynamics of the Gut Bacteria in Tibetan Awang Sheep () Across Divergent Breeding Models

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2025 Feb 26
PMID 40008045
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Tibetan Awang sheep (), indigenous to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, are highly adapted to high-altitude environment. However, knowledge regarding their gut bacterial composition remains limited.

Methods: A comprehensive 16S rRNA highthroughput sequencing was performed on fecal samples from 15 Awang sheep under pure grazing, semi-captivity, and full captivity breeding models.

Results: Our results revealed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the most abundant bacterial phyla, while , , , , and were prevalent genera in the gut microbiota of Awang sheep. Meanwhile, the predominant presence of with increasing altitude of breeding locations indirectly demonstrates its crucial role in mediating energy acquisition among Awang sheep at high altitudes. Furthermore, PCoA and ANOSIM analysis exhibited significant differences in bacterial composition across all breeding models ( > 0.6, < 0.001). , , and were significantly abundant in the pure grazing breeding model, while and were more abundant in the semi-captivity breeding model. An abnormally high abundance of indicated a potential risk of infection in the fully captive group. The environmental association analysis exhibited that meadows diet ( = 0.938, Pr[>r] = 0.001) and altitude ( = 0.892, Pr[>r] = 0.001) had significant effects on the dominant genera, explaining a substantial proportion of the total variation in community composition.

Discussion: Our study indicated that breeding conditions significantly impact the gut microbiota of Awang sheep. The environmental association analysis underscores the importance of diet and altitude in shaping the gut microbiota of Awang sheep. The present findings provide insights into the microbiota dynamics of Awang sheep and offer guidance for their scientific husbandry management.

References
1.
Pang K, Dai D, Yang Y, Wang X, Liu S, Huang W . Effects of high concentrate rations on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of yaks. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:957152. PMC: 9558216. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.957152. View

2.
Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen P . Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:14567. PMC: 4598811. DOI: 10.1038/srep14567. View

3.
Li Y, Hu X, Yang S, Zhou J, Zhang T, Qi L . Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota Composition between Captive and Wild Forest Musk Deer. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:1705. PMC: 5591822. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01705. View

4.
Thapa S, Zhou S, OHair J, Al Nasr K, Ropelewski A, Li H . Exploring the microbial diversity and characterization of cellulase and hemicellulase genes in goat rumen: a metagenomic approach. BMC Biotechnol. 2023; 23(1):51. PMC: 10696843. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-023-00821-6. View

5.
Ma Y, Deng X, Yang X, Wang J, Li T, Hua G . Characteristics of Bacterial Microbiota in Different Intestinal Segments of Aohan Fine-Wool Sheep. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:874536. PMC: 9097873. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.874536. View