» Articles » PMID: 40006792

Integrative Trait Analysis for Enhancing Heat Stress Resilience in Tomato ( L.): A Focus on Root, Physiological, and Yield Adaptations

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2025 Feb 26
PMID 40006792
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tomato ( L.) is an economically important crop worldwide, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. However, production is significantly and increasingly affected by the impacts of climate change, including heat and drought stress and emerging pests and diseases. This study specifically evaluated the effects of heat stress on root and shoot morphology, photosynthesis, and yield traits in five tomato genotypes, to identify the characteristics that differentiate heat tolerance from susceptibility. Heat stress experiments were conducted in a polyhouse, one during the summer under high temperatures, with a non-stress trial during the winter under conducive natural conditions. Significant reductions in yield, root traits and photosynthesis were observed across all genotypes under heat stress. However, the genotype MG785-1 maintained a relatively higher yield (298.01 ± 25.1 g), a 37.7% reduction compared to non-stress conditions, while CLN4786F1 showed resilience with a 32.3% decrease compared to its non-stress harvest index. Root dry weight (5.91 ± 0.53 g in MG785-1) and root shoot ratio (0.19 ± 0.01 in MG785-1) were identified as key traits for heat tolerance. Physiological traits, such as photosynthetic rate (11.71 ± 1.61 µmol CO m s in MG785-1), were critical for maintaining growth under heat stress. In contrast, the heat-sensitive genotype CLN3961D exhibited a significant decline in yield and physiological performance. Root dry weight and root to shoot ratio were key indicators for heat tolerance, while the photosynthetic rate was critical for maintaining plant growth under stress. These findings underscore the importance of integrated root and physiological traits, providing valuable insights for breeding climate-resilient tomato varieties.

References
1.
Dhyani K, Ansari M, Rao Y, Verma R, Shukla A, Tuteja N . Comparative physiological response of wheat genotypes under terminal heat stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2013; 8(6):e24564. PMC: 3906425. DOI: 10.4161/psb.24564. View

2.
Li H, Testerink C, Zhang Y . How roots and shoots communicate through stressful times. Trends Plant Sci. 2021; 26(9):940-952. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.005. View

3.
Barnabas B, Jager K, Feher A . The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell Environ. 2007; 31(1):11-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.x. View

4.
Klee H, Tieman D . The genetics of fruit flavour preferences. Nat Rev Genet. 2018; 19(6):347-356. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-018-0002-5. View

5.
Li L, Zhang Q, Huang D . A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors (Basel). 2014; 14(11):20078-111. PMC: 4279472. DOI: 10.3390/s141120078. View