Assessment of the Influence of Antisolvent 3D Printing Conditions on the Mechanical and Biological Properties of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid Scaffolds

Overview

Journal Polymers (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Date 2025 Feb 26

PMID 40006163

Authors

Anton V Mironov

Ekaterina M Trifanova

Tatyana B Bukharova

Andrey V Vasilyev

Viktoria O Chernomyrdina

Irina A Nedorubova

Valeriya S Kuznetsova

Andrey G Dunaev

Vladimir K Popov

Anatoly A Kulakov

Fedor F Losev

Dmitry V Goldshtein

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This paper describes an evaluation of the mechanical and biological properties of highly porous, biocompatible poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds produced using the antisolvent 3D printing technique under various forming conditions. The dependence of the scaffolds' microstructure, PLGA molecular weight distribution, and cell adhesion properties on temperature and injection nozzle diameter was evaluated. All samples consisted of fibers with different inner polymer distributions formed by specific radial, highly porous structures with a mean pore length of less than 50 μm and a diameter below 10 μm. The microstructure formed using a nozzle with a diameter of 160 μm showed a moderate correlation with printing temperature, while for the 330 μm nozzle, there was no significant difference in microstructures formed at different temperatures. Scaffolds produced at lower temperatures of 4 °C with a thin nozzle showed better compression load characteristics in terms of strength. In contrast, a larger nozzle allowed the production of a PLGA structure with improved elasticity. A 10-17% change in the molecular weight of PLGA was observed during printing, but no influence on biological properties was found. All types of PLGA scaffolds tested demonstrated good biocompatibility and promoted cell adhesion compared to the control.

References

Johnston A, Callanan A . Recent Methods for Modifying Mechanical Properties of Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Clinical Applications. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023; 8(2). PMC: 10204517. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics8020205. View

Rocha C, Goncalves V, Costa Da Silva M, Banobre-Lopez M, Gallo J . PLGA-Based Composites for Various Biomedical Applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(4). PMC: 8876940. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042034. View

Mironov A, Grigoryev A, Krotova L, Skaletsky N, Popov V, Sevastianov V . 3D printing of PLGA scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016; 105(1):104-109. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35871. View

Krebs M, Sutter K, Lin A, Guldberg R, Alsberg E . Injectable poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid scaffolds with in situ pore formation for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009; 5(8):2847-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.035. View

Khvorostina M, Mironov A, Nedorubova I, Bukharova T, Vasilyev A, Goldshtein D . 3D Printed Gene-Activated Sodium Alginate Hydrogel Scaffolds. Gels. 2022; 8(7). PMC: 9319089. DOI: 10.3390/gels8070421. View

Ding D, Zhu Q . Recent advances of PLGA micro/nanoparticles for the delivery of biomacromolecular therapeutics. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018; 92:1041-1060. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.036. View

Algebraistova P, Basko A, Ilyasova A, Lebedeva T, Mironov A, Pochivalov K . Phase Equilibria and Structure Formation in the Polylactic-co-Glycolic Acid/Tetraglycol/Water Ternary System. Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(5). PMC: 10007394. DOI: 10.3390/polym15051281. View

Lin C, Kang J . Mechanical Properties of Compact Bone Defined by the Stress-Strain Curve Measured Using Uniaxial Tensile Test: A Concise Review and Practical Guide. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(15). PMC: 8347989. DOI: 10.3390/ma14154224. View

Goldstein A, Zhu G, Morris G, Meszlenyi R, Mikos A . Effect of osteoblastic culture conditions on the structure of poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foam scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 1999; 5(5):421-34. DOI: 10.1089/ten.1999.5.421. View

10.

Kammerer P, Al-Nawas B . Bone reconstruction of extensive maxillomandibular defects in adults. Periodontol 2000. 2023; 93(1):340-357. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12499. View

11.

Ramanathan S, Lin Y, Thirumurugan S, Hu C, Duann Y, Chung R . Poly(methyl methacrylate) in Orthopedics: Strategies, Challenges, and Prospects in Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(3). PMC: 10857151. DOI: 10.3390/polym16030367. View

12.

Hu J, Liu X, Ma P . Induction of osteoblast differentiation phenotype on poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibrous matrix. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(28):3815-21. PMC: 3893021. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.015. View

13.

Wang L, Venkatraman S, Gan L, Kleiner L . Structure formation in injectable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) depots. II. Nature of the gel. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 72(1):215-22. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30147. View

14.

Kulakov A, Gvetadze R, Brailovskaya T, Kharkova A, Dzikovitskaya L . [Modern approaches to dental implants placement in deficient alveolar bone]. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2017; 96(1):43-45. DOI: 10.17116/stomat201796143-45. View

15.

Sun F, Sun X, Wang H, Li C, Zhao Y, Tian J . Application of 3D-Printed, PLGA-Based Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(10). PMC: 9143187. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105831. View

16.

Giannitelli S, Accoto D, Trombetta M, Rainer A . Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2013; 10(2):580-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.024. View

17.

Tsang S, Ferreira N, Simpson A . The reconstruction of critical bone loss : the holy grail of orthopaedics. Bone Joint Res. 2022; 11(6):409-412. PMC: 9233404. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.116.BJR-2022-0186. View