Reliability and Validity of Key Performance Metrics of Modified 505 Test

Overview

Journal Life (Basel)

Specialty Biology

Date 2025 Feb 26

PMID 40003607

Authors

Aleksandar Zivkovic

Srdjan Markovic

Ivan Cuk

Olivera M Knezevic

Dragan M Mirkov

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study aims to explore the reliability and validity of essential performance metrics derived from a modified 505 Change of Direction (CoD) test. Twenty-seven physically active male participants (age: 18.77 ± 1.73 years) who engaged in three to five training sessions per week were assessed using both standard and modified sprint and CoD protocols. The evaluation focused on sprint time, CoD time, total time, and the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI). The modified protocols demonstrated good reliability for sprint and CoD times (ICC > 0.8, CV < 3%) and high validity, with strong correlations between standard and modified tests for sprint (r = 0.59-0.80) and CoD times (r = 0.58-0.80). The total time metric showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9), supporting its utility as a comprehensive measure. Reaction-time inclusion increased variability (CV > 7%) but enhanced ecological validity by reflecting real-world conditions. However, the LSI exhibited lower reliability (ICC < 0.6), indicating the need for further refinement. Combining multiple performance measures, the modified protocols streamlined assessments, reducing fatigue and redundancy without compromising precision. These findings highlight the potential of integrating multidimensional agility metrics in athletic evaluations, bridging the gap between controlled testing and competitive demands. Future research should explore broader populations and sport-specific stimuli to enhance applicability.

References

Sayers M . Influence of Test Distance on Change of Direction Speed Test Results. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(9):2412-6. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001045. View

Spiteri T, Newton R, Binetti M, Hart N, Sheppard J, Nimphius S . Mechanical Determinants of Faster Change of Direction and Agility Performance in Female Basketball Athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(8):2205-14. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000876. View

Scanlan A, Humphries B, Tucker P, Dalbo V . The influence of physical and cognitive factors on reactive agility performance in men basketball players. J Sports Sci. 2013; 32(4):367-74. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2013.825730. View

Harper D, Carling C, Kiely J . High-Intensity Acceleration and Deceleration Demands in Elite Team Sports Competitive Match Play: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Sports Med. 2019; 49(12):1923-1947. PMC: 6851047. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01170-1. View

Nimphius S, Callaghan S, Spiteri T, Lockie R . Change of Direction Deficit: A More Isolated Measure of Change of Direction Performance Than Total 505 Time. J Strength Cond Res. 2016; 30(11):3024-3032. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001421. View

Popowczak M, Rokita A, Struzik A, Cichy I, Dudkowski A, Chmura P . Multi-Directional Sprinting and Acceleration Phase in Basketball and Handball Players Aged 14 and 15 Years. Percept Mot Skills. 2016; 123(2):543-63. DOI: 10.1177/0031512516664744. View

Sheppard J, Young W, Doyle T, Sheppard T, Newton R . An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport. 2006; 9(4):342-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.019. View

van Melick N, Meddeler B, Hoogeboom T, Nijhuis-van Der Sanden M, van Cingel R . How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0189876. PMC: 5747428. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189876. View

Maloney S . The Relationship Between Asymmetry and Athletic Performance: A Critical Review. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 33(9):2579-2593. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002608. View

10.

Bishop C, Read P, Brazier J, Jarvis P, Chavda S, Bromley T . Effects of Interlimb Asymmetries on Acceleration and Change of Direction Speed: A Between-Sport Comparison of Professional Soccer and Cricket Athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2019; 35(8):2095-2101. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003135. View

11.

Spencer M, Bishop D, Dawson B, Goodman C . Physiological and metabolic responses of repeated-sprint activities:specific to field-based team sports. Sports Med. 2005; 35(12):1025-44. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200535120-00003. View

12.

Little T, Williams A . Specificity of acceleration, maximum speed, and agility in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19(1):76-8. DOI: 10.1519/14253.1. View

13.

Kutlu M, Yapici H, Yoncalik O, Celik S . Comparison of a new test for agility and skill in soccer with other agility tests. J Hum Kinet. 2013; 33:143-50. PMC: 3588674. DOI: 10.2478/v10078-012-0053-1. View

14.

Cuthbert M, Thomas C, DosSantos T, Jones P . Application of Change of Direction Deficit to Evaluate Cutting Ability. J Strength Cond Res. 2019; 33(8):2138-2144. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002346. View

15.

Wen N, Dalbo V, Burgos B, Pyne D, Scanlan A . Power Testing in Basketball: Current Practice and Future Recommendations. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 32(9):2677-2691. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002459. View

16.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

17.

Lockie R, Jeffriess M, McGann T, Callaghan S, Schultz A . Planned and reactive agility performance in semiprofessional and amateur basketball players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013; 9(5):766-71. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0324. View

18.

Sheppard J, Young W . Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci. 2006; 24(9):919-32. DOI: 10.1080/02640410500457109. View

19.

Theofilou G, Ladakis I, Mavroidi C, Kilintzis V, Mirachtsis T, Chouvarda I . The Effects of a Visual Stimuli Training Program on Reaction Time, Cognitive Function, and Fitness in Young Soccer Players. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(17). PMC: 9460176. DOI: 10.3390/s22176680. View

20.

DosSantos T, Thomas C, Jones P, Comfort P . Assessing Asymmetries in Change of Direction Speed Performance: Application of Change of Direction Deficit. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 33(11):2953-2961. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002438. View