» Articles » PMID: 40003258

Australian Clinicians' Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations in Implementing Exposure and Response Prevention for Youth with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Exploratory Study

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2025 Feb 26
PMID 40003258
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Informed by implementation science, this exploratory study examined the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations of Australian mental health clinicians ( = 38) associated with the implementation of exposure and response prevention (ERP) for youth (i.e., children and adolescents) with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It also explored how the capabilities and motivations of mental health clinicians untrained in ERP for youth (i.e., typical clinicians; = 25) differed from clinicians experienced in the use of ERP for youth (i.e., experienced clinicians; = 13). Questionnaires were administered to the entire sample alongside observational role-plays, which assessed observed adherence and competence delivering ERP against published best-practice standards among available participants. In the whole sample, the reported time dedicated to implementing ERP was associated with a range of factors relating to capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to implement ERP. Experienced clinicians had greater knowledge, adherence, competence, and self-reported confidence using ERP and fewer negative beliefs about ERP relative to typical clinicians. They also intended to dedicate greater time to implementing within-session ERP for youth and reported greater within- and between-session time spent doing so compared to typical clinicians. The time intended to dedicate to implementing between-sessions ERP did not significantly differ between the clinician groups. In summary, compared to typical clinicians, experienced clinicians appeared to possess greater levels of capabilities and motivations to implement ERP for youth with OCD. Future research examining barriers and facilitators of ERP implementation in community settings and identifying effective strategies to improve it would benefit service provision and, ultimately, outcomes for youth.

References
1.
Sars D, van Minnen A . On the use of exposure therapy in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a survey among cognitive behavioural therapists in the Netherlands. BMC Psychol. 2015; 3:26. PMC: 4525733. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-015-0083-2. View

2.
Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

3.
Williams N, Beidas R . Annual Research Review: The state of implementation science in child psychology and psychiatry: a review and suggestions to advance the field. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018; 60(4):430-450. PMC: 6389440. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12960. View

4.
Macul Ferreira de Barros P, do Rosario M, Szejko N, Polga N, Requena G, Ravagnani B . Risk factors for obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Follow-up of a community-based youth cohort. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020; 30(1):89-104. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01495-7. View

5.
Lenhard F, Aspvall K, Andersson E, Ahlen J, Serlachius E, Lavner M . The Cost of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Swedish Youth. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021; 54(1):248-254. PMC: 9867673. DOI: 10.1007/s10578-021-01261-z. View