» Articles » PMID: 40002934

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Poor Prognostic Factors Following Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) for Early Rectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2025 Feb 26
PMID 40002934
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is an organ-preserving approach for treatment of early rectal cancer (ERC). However, adverse histopathological features identified post-TEMS often necessitate adjuvant therapy. This study aims to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who underwent TEMS and were offered adjuvant treatments with total mesorectal excision (TME), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), radiotherapy (RT), active surveillance, or dose escalation with contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB). This study included patients treated with TEMS for ERC between September 2012 and December 2022, with follow-up until December 2023. Patients with adverse histopathological features (extra-mural venous invasion, lympho-vascular invasion, R1 margins, tumour budding) were assigned to adjuvant treatments. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to mitigate selection bias. Of the 117 patients, 24 underwent TME, 17 received CRT, 25 received RT, 14 underwent active surveillance, and 37 patients received CXB boost along with CRT. The median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 52-73). During this time, 29 patients developed recurrence, and 15 died. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 78.6%, and disease-free survival (DFS) was 70.9%. Compared to CXB, the mortality risk for CRT (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.20-3.28; = 0.77) and TME (HR = 3.68; 95% CI: 0.46-29.79; = 0.22) was not significantly different. However, TME was associated with a significantly higher recurrence risk compared to CXB (HR = 7.57; 95% CI: 1.23-46.84; = 0.029). An organ-preserving strategy with CRT or CRT combined with a CXB boost may offer comparable long-term outcomes and reduced recurrence risks for patients undergoing TEMS for ERC with poor prognostic features. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to validate these results.

References
1.
Paty P, Nash G, Baron P, Zakowski M, Minsky B, Blumberg D . Long-term results of local excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2002; 236(4):522-29; discussion 529-30. PMC: 1422607. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00015. View

2.
Javed M, Shamim S, Slawik S, Andrews T, Montazeri A, Ahmed S . Long-term outcomes of patients with poor prognostic factors following transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(8):1953-1960. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15693. View

3.
Peng H, Liao Z, Lin X, Qiu X, You K . Definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal cancer with early stage of cT1-2N0. Cancer Manag Res. 2019; 11:5221-5229. PMC: 6578584. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S198113. View

4.
Balyasnikova S, Read J, Tait D, Wotherspoon A, Swift I, Cunningham D . The results of local excision with or without postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for early rectal cancer among patients choosing to avoid radical surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2016; 19(2):139-147. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13477. View

5.
Morino M, Risio M, Bach S, Beets-Tan R, Bujko K, Panis Y . Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(4):755-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4067-3. View