» Articles » PMID: 40002877

Risk of Cervical Carcinoma After Unfavorable Behavior and High Genetic Risk in the UK Biobank: A Prospective Nested Case-Control Study

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2025 Feb 26
PMID 40002877
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Previous studies have established a general understanding of the association between risky sexual behavior, genetic risk, and cervical carcinoma. However, these studies were conducted several years ago and lack systematic analysis using high-quality and population-based data. : We conducted a prospective nested case-control study to identify risky behaviors and developed a behavior score. Combining the behavior score and genetic risk, we evaluated the effect of sexual and reproductive behavior and PRS on cervical carcinoma through the developed conditional logistic regression models. : We verified increased carcinoma risk in individuals with early sexual intercourse (OR: 1.41 [95% CI 1.09 to 1.83], 0.0083), non-monogamous sexual partners (OR: 3.13 [95% CI 2.15 to 4.57], < 0.0001), three or more live births (OR: 1.44 [95% CI 1.12 to 1.84], 0.0040), and high PRS (polygenic risk score) (top 25% of PRS, OR: 1.58 [95% CI 1.15 to 2.16], 0.0044). The unfavorable sexual and reproductive behavior score we developed was linked to a 151% increased risk (OR: 2.51 [95% CI 1.79 to 3.52], < 0.0001) after adjusting for PRS. Women with both unfavorable behavior and high genetic risk had a 5.5-fold increased cervical carcinoma risk (OR: 5.45 [95% CI 2.72 to 10.95], < 0.0001) compared to individuals with favorable behavior and low genetic risk. : Unfavorable sexual and reproductive behavior increases the risk of cervical carcinoma, especially in those with a high genetic risk. These findings encourage us to adhere to a healthy sexual and reproductive pattern.

References
1.
Autier P, Coibion M, Huet F, Grivegnee A . Transformation zone location and intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix uteri. Br J Cancer. 1996; 74(3):488-90. PMC: 2074626. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.388. View

2.
Munoz N, Franceschi S, Bosetti C, Moreno V, Herrero R, Smith J . Role of parity and human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: the IARC multicentric case-control study. Lancet. 2002; 359(9312):1093-101. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08151-5. View

3.
Kim R . A new comparison of nested case-control and case-cohort designs and methods. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014; 30(3):197-207. PMC: 4374014. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-014-9974-4. View

4.
Itarat Y, Kietpeerakool C, Jampathong N, Chumworathayi B, Kleebkaow P, Aue-Aungkul A . Sexual behavior and infection with cervical human papillomavirus types 16 and 18. Int J Womens Health. 2019; 11:489-494. PMC: 6716589. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S218441. View

5.
Rahangdale L, Mungo C, OConnor S, Chibwesha C, Brewer N . Human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer risk. BMJ. 2022; 379:e070115. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070115. View