The "good Enough" Facilitator: Elucidating the Role of Working Alliance in the Mechanism of Facilitation

Overview

Journal Implement Sci Commun

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2025 Feb 26

PMID 40001234

Authors

Vera Yakovchenko

Monica Merante

Matthew J Chinman

Brittney Neely

Carolyn Lamorte

Sandra Gibson

JoAnn Kirchner

Timothy R Morgan

Shari S Rogal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: While facilitation is a widely used implementation strategy with proven effectiveness, the development of the facilitator-recipient relationship, i.e., working alliance, has received limited attention. However, we hypothesize that working alliance may be part of the mechanism by which facilitation activates change. This study aimed to examine the associations between working alliance, facilitation, and change in clinical care in a hybrid type 3 trial of a manualized intervention, Getting to Implementation (GTI).

Methods: This concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study was conducted at 12 sites in a stepped-wedge trial. We collected surveys using the Working Alliance Inventory-Short instrument (WAI), which includes three subscales of goal alignment, task alignment, and affective bond, from three respondent types (clinical facilitator, evaluation facilitator, and site team members) after a year of intervention. Facilitation activity type and dose were tracked. Summative qualitative interviews with site champions and facilitators) elicited perceptions on working alliance, facilitation, and experiences with the intervention, and results were triangulated with statistical bivariate analyses. The associations between WAI and facilitation time, fidelity, and change in liver cancer screening rate (the primary trial outcome) were assessed.

Results: Across 12 sites, facilitators and site team members completed 21 interviews and 40 WAI surveys, with site aggregate average working alliance scores of 5.9 ± 0.4 on a seven-point scale. Bond scores were highest (6.1 ± 0.5), followed by Goal (6.0 ± 0.4) and Task (5.8 ± 0.5) scores. Overall and subscale scores differed by respondent type, with site respondents consistently rating items higher than facilitators, particularly in Task items. Fidelity to the GTI process (e.g., timely completion of steps and tools) was significantly positively associated with WAI scores overall (r = 0.41, p = 0.007) and subscale scores, including Goal (r = 0.39, p = 0.011), Task (r = 0.42, p = 0.006), and Bond (r = 0.33, p = 0.039). WAI scores were not correlated with facilitation time (dose). WAI scores overall and the Bond and Goal scores were significantly positively associated with sustained improvement in cancer screening rates (r = 0.57, p = 0.015).

Conclusions: In this implementation trial, working alliance between site teams and facilitators was positively associated with both fidelity and cancer screening outcomes and was notably independent of time spent providing facilitation. Findings highlight the importance of working alliance in implementation studies.

Trial Registration: This project was registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov ( NCT04178096 ) on 4/29/20.

References

Olmos-Ochoa T, Ganz D, Barnard J, Penney L, Finley E, Hamilton A . Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience. Implement Sci Commun. 2021; 2(1):65. PMC: 8218441. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00171-4. View

Rogal S, Yakovchenko V, Morgan T, Bajaj J, Gonzalez R, Park A . Getting to implementation: a protocol for a Hybrid III stepped wedge cluster randomized evaluation of using data-driven implementation strategies to improve cirrhosis care for Veterans. Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):92. PMC: 7579930. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01050-7. View

Kilbourne A, Geng E, Eshun-Wilson I, Sweeney S, Shelley D, Cohen D . How does facilitation in healthcare work? Using mechanism mapping to illuminate the black box of a meta-implementation strategy. Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):53. PMC: 10190070. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00435-1. View

Meier S, Feeley T . Ceiling effects indicate a possible threshold structure for working alliance. J Couns Psychol. 2021; 69(2):235-245. DOI: 10.1037/cou0000564. View

Busseri M, Tyler J . Interchangeability of the Working Alliance Inventory and Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form. Psychol Assess. 2003; 15(2):193-7. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.193. View

Paap D, Karel Y, Verhagen A, Dijkstra P, Geertzen J, Pool G . The Working Alliance Inventory's Measurement Properties: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:945294. PMC: 9337219. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945294. View

Baier A, Kline A, Feeny N . Therapeutic alliance as a mediator of change: A systematic review and evaluation of research. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020; 82:101921. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101921. View

Rogal S, Jonassaint C, Ashcraft L, Freburger J, Yakovchenko V, Kislovskiy Y . Getting To Implementation (GTI)-Teach: A seven-step approach for teaching the fundamentals of implementation science. J Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 6(1):e100. PMC: 9428668. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.420. View

Heimbach J, Kulik L, Finn R, Sirlin C, Abecassis M, Roberts L . AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2017; 67(1):358-380. DOI: 10.1002/hep.29086. View

10.

Harvey G, Kitson A . PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016; 11:33. PMC: 4807546. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2. View

11.

Horvath A, Del Re A, Fluckiger C, Symonds D . Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011; 48(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1037/a0022186. View

12.

Yakovchenko V, Rogal S, Goodrich D, Lamorte C, Neely B, Merante M . Getting to implementation: Adaptation of an implementation playbook. Front Public Health. 2023; 10:980958. PMC: 9853037. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980958. View

13.

Ritchie M, Kirchner J, Townsend J, Pitcock J, Dollar K, Liu C . Time and Organizational Cost for Facilitating Implementation of Primary Care Mental Health Integration. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 35(4):1001-1010. PMC: 7174254. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05537-y. View

14.

Fluckiger C, Del Re A, Wampold B, Horvath A . The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018; 55(4):316-340. DOI: 10.1037/pst0000172. View

15.

Bidassie B, Williams L, Woodward-Hagg H, Matthias M, Damush T . Key components of external facilitation in an acute stroke quality improvement collaborative in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:69. PMC: 4437451. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0252-y. View

16.

Pfeifer E, Wittmann M . Waiting, Thinking, and Feeling: Variations in the Perception of Time During Silence. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:602. PMC: 7142212. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00602. View

17.

Roppolo R, McWilliam J, Aldridge 2nd W, Jenkins R, Boothroyd R, Moore L . Is the Concept of Self-Regulation Useful for Supporting Effective Implementation in Community Settings?. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019; 22(1):118-128. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-019-00286-0. View

18.

Murphy R, Hutton P . Practitioner Review: Therapist variability, patient-reported therapeutic alliance, and clinical outcomes in adolescents undergoing mental health treatment - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017; 59(1):5-19. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12767. View

19.

Zilcha-Mano S, Errazuriz P . Early development of mechanisms of change as a predictor of subsequent change and treatment outcome: The case of working alliance. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017; 85(5):508-520. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000192. View

20.

Ardito R, Rabellino D . Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:270. PMC: 3198542. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270. View