The Impact of Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement on the Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Rate for High-risk Anastomoses: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal BMC Gastroenterol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gastroenterology

Date 2025 Feb 25

PMID 40000944

Authors

Yuran Dai

Xiaozhi Lu

Lei Jiang

Zipeng Lu

Kuirong Jiang

Yi Miao

Jishu Wei

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the impact of pancreatic duct stent outcomes on the prognosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with high-risk anastomoses.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials were identified through comprehensive searches in Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases. Cochrane Collaboration's tool RoB2 was used to evaluate study quality. The presence of non-dilated main pancreatic duct and soft gland texture were used to identify high risk anastomoses. The primary outcome measured was clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate. The heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: Six studies (n = 476) were included. The pooled data showed no significant difference in the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate between stented and nonstented groups for at least one high-risk factor out of two factors selected (p = 0.234). Patients with non-dilated main pancreatic duct who received stent placement had a lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (RR = 0.582, 95%CI = 0.383-0.883, p = 0.011). In contrast, patients with soft pancreatic texture showed no significant difference between two groups (p = 0.879). After removing the study identified by sensitivity analysis as the origin of heterogeneity from general cohorts, the stented group had a lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (RR = 0.608, 95%CI = 0.413-0.895, p = 0.012).

Conclusions: There is a lack of robust evidence to support pancreatic duct stent placement for high-risk anastomoses. Nevertheless, stent implantation may be beneficial for patients with non-dilated pancreatic duct or external stent drainage.

Trial Registration: The protocol was registered in advance with PROSPERO (CRD42023471943).

References

Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T, Katayose Y, Unno M . Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy. Br J Surg. 2012; 99(4):524-31. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8654. View

Roder J, Stein H, Bottcher K, Busch R, Heidecke C, Siewert J . Stented versus nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 1999; 229(1):41-8. PMC: 1191606. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199901000-00005. View

Poon R, Fan S, Lo C, Ng K, Yuen W, Yeung C . External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(3):425-33. PMC: 1959348. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181492c28. View

Smyrniotis V, Arkadopoulos N, Kyriazi M, Derpapas M, Theodosopoulos T, Gennatas C . Does internal stenting of the pancreaticojejunostomy improve outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy? A prospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010; 395(3):195-200. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-009-0585-6. View

Sterne J, Savovic J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. View

Cai H, Lu F, Zhang M, Cai Y, Wang X, Li Y . Pancreaticojejunostomy without pancreatic duct stent after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: preliminary outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(5):3629-3636. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08909-w. View

Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M . The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017; 161(3):584-591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. View

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kitasato A, Adachi T, Kanematsu T . Stenting versus non-stenting in pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective study limited to a normal pancreas without fibrosis sorted by using dynamic MRI. Pancreas. 2010; 40(1):25-9. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181e861fa. View

10.

Mungroop T, Klompmaker S, Wellner U, Steyerberg E, Coratti A, DHondt M . Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation. Ann Surg. 2019; 273(2):334-340. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003234. View

11.

Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J . Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138(1):8-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001. View

12.

Schuh F, Mihaljevic A, Probst P, Trudeau M, Muller P, Marchegiani G . A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Ann Surg. 2021; 277(3):e597-e608. PMC: 9891297. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004855. View

13.

Xiong J, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu W, Li A . Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2012; 99(8):1050-61. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8788. View

14.

Zhou Y, Zhou Q, Li Z, Chen R . Internal pancreatic duct stent does not decrease pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2013; 205(6):718-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.039. View

15.

Shea B, Reeves B, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J . AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358:j4008. PMC: 5833365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. View

16.

Harbord R, Egger M, Sterne J . A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2005; 25(20):3443-57. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2380. View

17.

Qureshi S, Ghazanfar S, Quraishy M, Rana R . Stented Pancreatico-duodenectomy: Does it lead to decreased pancreatic fistula rates? A prospective randomized study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018; 68(3):348-352. View

18.

Methley A, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S . PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:579. PMC: 4310146. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0. View

19.

Jiang Y, Chen Q, Wang Z, Shao Y, Hu C, Ding Y . The Prognostic Value of External Internal Pancreatic Duct Stents in CR-POPF after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Invest Surg. 2020; 34(7):738-746. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1691687. View

20.

Singh K, Kaman L, Tandup C, Raypattanaik N, Dahiya D, Behera A . Internal stenting across the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis and main pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pol Przegl Chir. 2021; 93(3):1-5. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.7225. View