» Articles » PMID: 40000716

A Network Analysis of the Heterogeneity and Associated Risk and Protective Factors of Depression and Anxiety Among College Students

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2025 Feb 25
PMID 40000716
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Comorbidity of depression and anxiety is common among adolescents and can lead to adverse outcomes. However, there is limited understanding of the latent characteristics and mechanisms governing these disorders and their interactions. Moreover, few studies have examined the impacts of relevant risk and protective factors.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 1,719 students. Mplus 8.0 software was used to conduct latent profile analysis to explore the potential categories of depression and anxiety comorbidities. R4.3.2 software was used to explore the network of core depression and anxiety symptoms, bridge these disorders, and evaluate the effects of risk and protective factors.

Results: Three categories were established: "healthy" (57.8%), "mild depression-mild anxiety" (36.6%), and "moderately severe depression-moderate anxiety" (5.6%). "Depressed mood", "nervousness", and "difficulty relaxing" were core symptoms in both the depression-anxiety comorbidity network and the network of risk and protective factors. Stress perception and neuroticism serve as bridging nodes connecting some symptoms of depression and anxiety and are thus considered the most prominent risk factors.

Conclusions: According to the core and bridging symptoms identified in this study, targeted intervention and treatment can be provided to groups with comorbid depression and anxiety, thereby reducing the risk of these comorbidities in adolescents.

References
1.
Epskamp S, Fried E . A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods. 2018; 23(4):617-634. DOI: 10.1037/met0000167. View

2.
Ruan Q, Chen C, Jiang D, Yan W, Lin Z . A network analysis of social problem-solving and anxiety/depression in adolescents. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:921781. PMC: 9401098. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.921781. View

3.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics. 2007; 9(3):432-41. PMC: 3019769. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045. View

4.
McCrae R, John O . An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers. 1992; 60(2):175-215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x. View

5.
Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried E . Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(1):195-212. PMC: 5809547. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1. View