» Articles » PMID: 40000565

Profiles of Family Stressors Among Low-Income Families with Young Children

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2025 Feb 25
PMID 40000565
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study examined profiles of family stressors, based on the five dimensions of the Family Stress Model (economic hardship, economic pressure, parental psychological distress, interparental relationship problems, and disrupted parenting) among low-income families with young children. We aimed to validate the model with a sample of low-income families and then to determine whether there were reliable profiles of families on the five dimensions.

Methods: Mothers completed questionnaires when children were between six and 15 months old to capture background information and 14 key indicators of the five Family Stress Model dimensions. Our analytical sample comprised 353 families that provided data for at least one key indicator. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to statistically validate the Family Stress Model, then explored distinct profiles using latent profile analyses (LPA), and examined how profile membership correlated with family characteristics.

Results: CFA model fit indices indicated a good fit of the data relative to the theoretical model. LPA revealed three distinct profiles of stressor among families, consistent with low, medium, and high patterns of stressors. Families in the high-stress profile experienced larger household numbers, higher maternal loneliness, reduced social connectedness, and higher reports of unplanned pregnancy.

Conclusions For Practice: Findings show applicability of the Family Stress Model to low-income families with young children, and indicate that these families are diverse in terms of the stressors they experience, characterized by three distinct profiles. In this regard, low-income families should not be viewed monolithically, but rather as experiencing variability in the stressors they face.

References
1.
Bernard K, Zwerling J, Dozier M . Effects of early adversity on young children's diurnal cortisol rhythms and externalizing behavior. Dev Psychobiol. 2015; 57(8):935-47. PMC: 5773098. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21324. View

2.
Boivin M, Perusse D, Dionne G, Saysset V, Zoccolillo M, Tarabulsy G . The genetic-environmental etiology of parents' perceptions and self-assessed behaviours toward their 5-month-old infants in a large twin and singleton sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005; 46(6):612-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00375.x. View

3.
Conger R, Ebert Wallace L, Sun Y, Simons R, McLoyd V, Brody G . Economic pressure in African American families: a replication and extension of the family stress model. Dev Psychol. 2002; 38(2):179-93. View

4.
Norbury C, Gooch D, Wray C, Baird G, Charman T, Simonoff E . The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016; 57(11):1247-1257. PMC: 5082564. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12573. View

5.
Russell D . UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996; 66(1):20-40. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2. View