Translation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Rating-of-Fatigue Scale

Overview

Journal Sports Med Open

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2025 Feb 25

PMID 40000516

Authors

Joao Barreira

Joao Brito

Fabio Yuzo Nakamura

Pedro Figueiredo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Rating-of-Fatigue (ROF) scale is a validated tool to measure changes in perceived fatigue in sports and everyday contexts; thus, this study aimed to translate and validate the Portuguese version of the ROF scale. For this, the study was composed of three phases. Phase 1 involved a comprehensive translation of the ROF scale into Portuguese, followed by a back-translation and a consolidation process to obtain the final version of the ROF scale in Portuguese. In phase 2, the face validity of the scale was assessed. Seventy-three native Portuguese speakers responded to a series of Likert scale items designed to evaluate the purpose of the scale and assess whether it accurately measured the intended construct. In the final phase, the convergent and divergent validity of the scale was assessed during an incremental cycling test to exhaustion, followed by 10 min of passive recovery and a subsequent repetition of the initial 5 min of the test. The study was conducted between October 2023 and June 2024 in Portugal.

Results: The results from phase 1 indicated a high level of comparability and interpretability between the original and back-translated versions, with only minor adjustments made to finalize the Portuguese version of the ROF scale. In phase 2, a high level of face validity was observed. The median score for the item "measures fatigue" was (median [IQR]) was 3.0 [3.0, 4.0] out of 4. After participants were provided with the scale instructions, the face validity score improved significantly (4.0 [3.0, 4.0]; p = 0.001). In phase 3, during the incremental test, very large correlations were observed between ROF, and key physiological and performance indicators, including rating of perceived exertion (RPE), heart rate, oxygen consumption, and power output. Discriminant validity between ROF and RPE was found during the recovery.

Conclusions: The present study indicates that the Portuguese version of the ROF maintains the properties of the original version and can be used effectively in the Portuguese language.

References

Shen J, Barbera J, Shapiro C . Distinguishing sleepiness and fatigue: focus on definition and measurement. Sleep Med Rev. 2005; 10(1):63-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2005.05.004. View

Kluger B, Krupp L, Enoka R . Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: proposal for a unified taxonomy. Neurology. 2013; 80(4):409-16. PMC: 3589241. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07be. View

Davis J . Central and peripheral factors in fatigue. J Sports Sci. 1995; 13 Spec No:S49-53. DOI: 10.1080/02640419508732277. View

Meyer T, Georg T, Becker C, Kindermann W . Reliability of gas exchange measurements from two different spiroergometry systems. Int J Sports Med. 2001; 22(8):593-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18523. View

Borg G . Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14(5):377-81. View

Ni Z, Sun F, Li Y . Heart Rate Variability-Based Subjective Physical Fatigue Assessment. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(9). PMC: 9100264. DOI: 10.3390/s22093199. View

Kentta G, Hassmen P . Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med. 1998; 26(1):1-16. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199826010-00001. View

Sperber A . Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126(1 Suppl 1):S124-8. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016. View

Colorni E, Ohayon E, Cote J, Obolski U, Halperin I . Should I Rest or Should I Go Now? A Randomized Cross-Over Trial Comparing Fixed and Self-Selected Rest Durations in High-Intensity Interval Training Cycling Sessions. Sports Med Open. 2023; 9(1):52. PMC: 10317935. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-023-00601-8. View

10.

MOSIER C . A critical examination of the concepts of face validity. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010; 7(2):191-205. DOI: 10.1177/001316444700700201. View

11.

Martinent G, Decret J, Isoard-Gautheur S, Filaire E, Ferrand C . Evaluations of the psychometric properties of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes among a sample of young French table tennis players. Psychol Rep. 2014; 114(2):326-40. DOI: 10.2466/03.14.PR0.114k18w2. View

12.

Coutts A, Slattery K, Wallace L . Practical tests for monitoring performance, fatigue and recovery in triathletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2007; 10(6):372-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.02.007. View

13.

Da Silva F, Piponnier E, Corcelle B, Blain G, Gioda J, Colson S . Submaximal fatiguing eccentric contractions of knee flexors alter leg extrapersonal representation. Heliyon. 2023; 9(8):e18884. PMC: 10440467. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18884. View

14.

Malleron T, Har-Nir I, Vigotsky A, Halperin I . Rating of perceived effort but relative to what? A comparison between imposed and self-selected anchors. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023; 66:102396. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102396. View

15.

Li J . Effect size measures in a two-independent-samples case with nonnormal and nonhomogeneous data. Behav Res Methods. 2015; 48(4):1560-1574. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0667-z. View

16.

Vetter R, Symonds M . Correlations between injury, training intensity, and physical and mental exhaustion among college athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(3):587-96. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c7c2eb. View

17.

Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. View

18.

Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J . Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 41(1):3-13. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278. View

19.

Halson S . Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. 2014; 44 Suppl 2:S139-47. PMC: 4213373. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z. View

20.

Micklewright D, St Clair Gibson A, Gladwell V, Al Salman A . Development and Validity of the Rating-of-Fatigue Scale. Sports Med. 2017; 47(11):2375-2393. PMC: 5633636. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0711-5. View