» Articles » PMID: 39999096

Spatial Prediction of Dynamic Interactions in Rats

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2025 Feb 25
PMID 39999096
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals and humans receive the most critical information from parts of the environment that are immediately inaccessible and highly dynamic. The brain must effectively process potential interactions between elements in such an environment to make appropriate decisions in critical situations. We trained male Long-Evans rats to discriminate static and dynamic spatial stimuli and to generalize novel dynamic spatial stimuli displayed on an inaccessible computer screen. We provide behavioral evidence indicating that rats encode dynamic visuospatial situations by constructing internal static representations that capture meaningful future interactions between objects. These observations support previous findings in humans that such internal static representations can encapsulate relevant spatiotemporal information of dynamic environments. This mechanism would allow animals and humans to process complex time-changing situations neatly.

References
1.
Chan E, Baumann O, Bellgrove M, Mattingley J . From objects to landmarks: the function of visual location information in spatial navigation. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:304. PMC: 3427909. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00304. View

2.
Schiller D, Eichenbaum H, Buffalo E, Davachi L, Foster D, Leutgeb S . Memory and Space: Towards an Understanding of the Cognitive Map. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(41):13904-11. PMC: 6608181. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2618-15.2015. View

3.
Eichenbaum H . On the Integration of Space, Time, and Memory. Neuron. 2017; 95(5):1007-1018. PMC: 5662113. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.036. View

4.
Widloski J, Foster D . Flexible rerouting of hippocampal replay sequences around changing barriers in the absence of global place field remapping. Neuron. 2022; 110(9):1547-1558.e8. PMC: 9473153. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.02.002. View

5.
TOLMAN E . Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev. 1948; 55(4):189-208. DOI: 10.1037/h0061626. View