Ecuadorian Holstein-Friesian Cattle Paternal Lineages: Demographic Structure, Inbreeding Evolution, and Genetic Diversity

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2025 Feb 25

PMID 39999056

Authors

Luis F Cartuche-Macas

Miguel A Gutierrez-Reinoso

Edilberto Chacon

Carlos O Larrea-Izurieta

Joar M Garcia-Flores

Manuel Garcia-Herreros

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Holstein-Friesian cattle are the most important dairy breed worldwide. The main objective was to carry out a detailed pedigree evaluation of the Ecuadorian Holstein-Friesian cattle to investigate the demographic structure, inbreeding evolution, and genetic diversity of the official paternal lineages to determine the potential GD loss after the inclusion of modern Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs). Official pedigree information from 28,893 Holstein-Friesian sires born between 1950 and 2021 and enrolled with the Ecuadorian Holstein-Friesian Association (AHFE, Ecuador) were recorded and evaluated from USA and Canada genetic official databases. After multiple-trait across-country genetic analyses the total population was divided into four subpopulations; i) 1950-1969: natural mating (NM) period; ii) 1970-1989: NM + artificial insemination (AI) period; iii) 1990-2009: AI + embryo transfer (ET) period; and iv) 2010-2021: AI + ET + genomic selection (GS) period. Demographic parameters [number of males, pedigree integrity (PI), and generation interval (GI)] were analysed. PI was analysed using known ancestors up to 4 generations considering the number of complete (GCom), maximum (GMax) and equivalent (GEqu) generations. Moreover, Inbreeding parameters [inbreeding coefficient (F), average relatedness (AR), coancestry (C), effective size (Ne), genetic conservation index (GCI)] and parameters related to the gene origin probability (number of founders (f), effective number of founders (fe), genetic conservation index (GCI), among others] were also analysed, together with the fe/f ratio, fge/fe ratio, genetic contributions, and genetic diversity loss (GD-loss) derived parameters. The results indicated that nearly all imported sires used in Ecuador born in the beginning of 1990s could be traced to just three countries, who together account for > 90% of paternal lineages. This fact indicates that GD has undergone a dramatic decrease during the past 30 years. The PCI for the three last periods were > 55%, and the trend was enhanced in the fourth chronological period till > 92%. The estimated proportion of random genetic drift in GD loss increased over time as well as the Ne that decreased by the time. In conclusion, the occurrence of AI + ET + GS period led to the major GD loss. Therefore, due to the extremely limited number of paternal lineages the strategy for recovering the minimal GD on the current and future Ecuadorian Holstein-Friesian cattle should reduce the inbreeding values by increasing the Ne using alternately the foreign genetic material and the national breeding stock.

References

Huson H, Sonstegard T, Godfrey J, Hambrook D, Wolfe C, Wiggans G . A Genetic Investigation of Island Jersey Cattle, the Foundation of the Jersey Breed: Comparing Population Structure and Selection to Guernsey, Holstein, and United States Jersey Cattle. Front Genet. 2020; 11:366. PMC: 7181675. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00366. View

Cole J, Null D, VanRaden P . Phenotypic and genetic effects of recessive haplotypes on yield, longevity, and fertility. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99(9):7274-7288. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10777. View

Haile-Mariam M, Nieuwhof G, Beard K, Konstatinov K, Hayes B . Comparison of heritabilities of dairy traits in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle from genomic and pedigree data and implications for genomic evaluations. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013; 130(1):20-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2013.01001.x. View

Dadar M, Ansari Mahyari S, Rokouei M, Edriss M . Rates of inbreeding and genetic diversity in Iranian Holstein cattle. Anim Sci J. 2014; 85(10):888-94. DOI: 10.1111/asj.12228. View

Leroy G, Mary-Huard T, Verrier E, Danvy S, Charvolin E, Danchin-Burge C . Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: Examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genet Sel Evol. 2013; 45:1. PMC: 3599586. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-1. View

Eriksson S, Strandberg E, Johansson A . Changes in genomic inbreeding and diversity over half a century in Swedish Red and Swedish Holstein dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 2023; 140(3):295-303. DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12758. View

Garcia-Ruiz A, Ruiz-Lopez F, Van Tassell C, Montaldo H, Huson H . Genetic differentiation of Mexican Holstein cattle and its relationship with Canadian and U.S. Holsteins. Front Genet. 2015; 6:7. PMC: 4321612. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00007. View

Moore S, Hasler J . A 100-Year Review: Reproductive technologies in dairy science. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(12):10314-10331. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13138. View

Gutierrez-Reinoso M, Aponte P, Garcia-Herreros M . Genomic and Phenotypic Udder Evaluation for Dairy Cattle Selection: A Review. Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(10). PMC: 10215250. DOI: 10.3390/ani13101588. View

10.

Melka M, Stachowicz K, Miglior F, Schenkel F . Analyses of genetic diversity in five Canadian dairy breeds using pedigree data. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013; 130(6):476-86. DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12050. View

11.

Makanjuola B, Miglior F, Abdalla E, Maltecca C, Schenkel F, Baes C . Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103(6):5183-5199. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-18013. View

12.

Olthof L, Domecq J, Bradford B . Analysis of Jersey versus Holstein breed profitability on north central US dairies. JDS Commun. 2023; 4(5):344-348. PMC: 10505770. DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0371. View

13.

Henderson C . Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 1975; 31(2):423-47. View

14.

Viale E, Tiezzi F, Maretto F, De Marchi M, Penasa M, Cassandro M . Association of candidate gene polymorphisms with milk technological traits, yield, composition, and somatic cell score in Italian Holstein-Friesian sires. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(9):7271-7281. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-12666. View

15.

Williams M, Sleator R, Murphy C, McCarthy J, Berry D . Re-assessing the importance of linear type traits in predicting genetic merit for survival in an aging Holstein-Friesian dairy cow population. J Dairy Sci. 2022; 105(9):7550-7563. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22026. View

16.

Navas F, Jordana J, Leon J, Barba C, Delgado J . A model to infer the demographic structure evolution of endangered donkey populations. Animal. 2017; 11(12):2129-2138. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117000969. View

17.

Cartuche-Macas L, Lozada E, Gutierrez-Reinoso M, Chacon E, Navas F, Garcia-Herreros M . Evolution of Population Structure, Reproductive Performance, Inbreeding, and Genetic Diversity in Ecuadorian Charolais Cattle. Vet Sci. 2024; 11(11). PMC: 11599062. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11110566. View

18.

Dechow C, Liu W, Idun J, Maness B . Short communication: Two dominant paternal lineages for North American Jersey artificial insemination sires. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101(3):2281-2284. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13694. View

19.

Lamina C, Steffens M, Mueller J, Lohmussaar E, Meitinger T, Wichmann H . Genetic diversity in german and European populations: looking for substructures and genetic patterns. Gesundheitswesen. 2005; 67 Suppl 1:S127-31. DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858254. View

20.

Caballero A, Toro M . Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet Res. 2000; 75(3):331-43. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672399004449. View