» Articles » PMID: 39997925

Next Generation Risk Assessment to Address Disease-Related Vulnerability-A Proof of Concept for the Sunscreen Octocrylene

Overview
Journal Toxics
Date 2025 Feb 25
PMID 39997925
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Risk assessment for cosmetics in the European Union (EU) are triggered by a ban on animal testing and concerns of endocrine disruption (ED). The risk assessment focuses on healthy populations and, for potential ED, includes specific developmental stages as vulnerable due to specific concerns on endocrine effects. However, the assessment focuses on healthy individuals and does not consider that some pathologies may increase dermal absorption and even vulnerability to endocrine disruptors. Data from the EU risk assessment, human pharmacokinetic studies and ToxCast bioactivity were combined in a hypothesis-driven Next-Generation Risk Assessment to identify possible risk drivers for vulnerable populations including oncological patients and atopic dermatitis. In vitro effects are observed at concentration in the order of measured plasmatic levels under normal use patterns. The induction of hepatic enzymes is the most relevant bioactivity endpoint, in line with animal findings. The information on endocrine potential is inconclusive, and the possibility for skin effects and endocrine mechanism linked to tumor induction require further elucidation. The information on octocrylene (CAS number: 6197-30-4) bioactivity is limited, lacking information on the metabolites and the immunotoxicity potential, particularly relevant for oncological patients.

References
1.
Berardesca E, Zuberbier T, Sanchez Viera M, Marinovich M . Review of the safety of octocrylene used as an ultraviolet filter in cosmetics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019; 33 Suppl 7:25-33. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15945. View

2.
Apel P, Lamkarkach F, Lange R, Sissoko F, David M, Rousselle C . Human biomonitoring guidance values (HBM-GVs) for priority substances under the HBM4EU initiative - New values derivation for deltamethrin and cyfluthrin and overall results. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022; 248:114097. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114097. View

3.
Matta M, Florian J, Zusterzeel R, Pilli N, Patel V, Volpe D . Effect of Sunscreen Application on Plasma Concentration of Sunscreen Active Ingredients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020; 323(3):256-267. PMC: 6990686. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.20747. View

4.
Gustafson E, Debruyne C, Troyer O, Rogiers V, Vinken M, Vanhaecke T . Screening of repeated dose toxicity data in safety evaluation reports of cosmetic ingredients issued by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety between 2009 and 2019. Arch Toxicol. 2020; 94(11):3723-3735. PMC: 7603458. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02868-2. View

5.
Apel P, Rousselle C, Lange R, Sissoko F, Kolossa-Gehring M, Ougier E . Human biomonitoring initiative (HBM4EU) - Strategy to derive human biomonitoring guidance values (HBM-GVs) for health risk assessment. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020; 230:113622. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113622. View