» Articles » PMID: 39997605

The Relationship Between Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss and Resonance Frequency Analysis

Abstract

Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) has been used as a diagnostic method to measure implant stability at all stages of healing. In addition to evaluating the status of the peri-implant marginal bone, it can also indicate the most appropriate time to load the implant. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of RFA as a diagnostic method for the detection of peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL). Forty bone-level Klockner Vega implants were placed in a polyurethane block with elastic properties similar to those of the maxillary bone. The insertion torque and primary implant stability at the time of placement were measured using an RFA device. A circumferential peri-implant defect was created by removing the cortical bone portion in each implant using a trephine. The stability values were measured again using RFA. The stability values measured using RFA were lower after the creation of the circumferential peri-implant defect, indicating a statistically significant decrease in implant stability. The results of the study tend to show a relationship between peri-implant marginal bone loss and modifications in implant stability measured by RFA.

References
1.
Medina Madrid R, Padulles Roig E, Cabanes Gumbau G, Alarcon Rodriguez R, Boquete-Castro A . ISQ as a Diagnostic Tool in Implants Affected with Bone Loss: An In Vitro Experimental Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024; (3):468-472. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.10510. View

2.
Monje A, Salvi G . Diagnostic methods/parameters to monitor peri-implant conditions. Periodontol 2000. 2024; 95(1):20-39. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12584. View

3.
Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A . Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: a retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006; 8(4):218-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00022.x. View

4.
Choi H, Chung C, Kim S, Son M . Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor. Implant Dent. 2014; 23(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000000. View

5.
Ericsson I, Lindhe J . Probing depth at implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1993; 20(9):623-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00706.x. View