Accurate Prostate Segmentation in Large-Scale Magnetic Resonance Imaging Datasets Via First-in-First-Out Feature Memory and Multi-Scale Context Modeling

Overview

Journal J Imaging

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Radiology

Date 2025 Feb 25

PMID 39997563

Authors

Jingyi Zhu

Xukun Zhang

Xiao Luo

Zhiji Zheng

Kun Zhou

Yanlan Kang

Haiqing Li

Daoying Geng

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Prostate cancer, a prevalent malignancy affecting males globally, underscores the critical need for precise prostate segmentation in diagnostic imaging. However, accurate delineation via MRI still faces several challenges: (1) The distinction of the prostate from surrounding soft tissues is impeded by subtle boundaries in MRI images. (2) Regions such as the apex and base of the prostate exhibit inherent blurriness, which complicates edge extraction and precise segmentation. The objective of this study was to precisely delineate the borders of the prostate including the apex and base regions. This study introduces a multi-scale context modeling module to enhance boundary pixel representation, thus reducing the impact of irrelevant features on segmentation outcomes. Utilizing a first-in-first-out dynamic adjustment mechanism, the proposed methodology optimizes feature vector selection, thereby enhancing segmentation outcomes for challenging apex and base regions of the prostate. Segmentation of the prostate on 2175 clinically annotated MRI datasets demonstrated that our proposed MCM-UNet outperforms existing methods. The Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for prostate segmentation were 0.58 voxels and 91.71%, respectively. The prostate segmentation results closely matched those manually delineated by experienced radiologists. Consequently, our method significantly enhances the accuracy of prostate segmentation and holds substantial significance in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

References

Santhirasekaram A, Winkler M, Rockall A, Glocker B . Robust prostate disease classification using transformers with discrete representations. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024; 20(1):11-20. PMC: 11759462. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03153-8. View

Shelhamer E, Long J, Darrell T . Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2016; 39(4):640-651. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683. View

Donati O, Jung S, Vargas H, Gultekin D, Zheng J, Moskowitz C . Multiparametric prostate MR imaging with T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences: are all pulse sequences necessary to detect locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy?. Radiology. 2013; 268(2):440-50. PMC: 6940013. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122149. View

DAmico A, Whittington R, Malkowicz S, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick G . Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998; 280(11):969-74. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.11.969. View

Hung A, Zheng H, Miao Q, Raman S, Terzopoulos D, Sung K . CAT-Net: A Cross-Slice Attention Transformer Model for Prostate Zonal Segmentation in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022; 42(1):291-303. PMC: 10071136. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3211764. View

Vikal S, Haker S, Tempany C, Fichtinger G . Prostate contouring in MRI guided biopsy. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011; 7259:72594A. PMC: 2995890. DOI: 10.1117/12.812433. View

Daly T . Evolution of definitive external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2019; 38(3):565-591. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02661-6. View

Rawla P . Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019; 10(2):63-89. PMC: 6497009. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1191. View

Yu M, Pei K, Li X, Wei X, Wang C, Gao J . FBCU-Net: A fine-grained context modeling network using boundary semantic features for medical image segmentation. Comput Biol Med. 2022; 150:106161. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106161. View

10.

Zhou Z, Siddiquee M, Tajbakhsh N, Liang J . UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation. Deep Learn Med Image Anal Multimodal Learn Clin Decis Support (2018). 2020; 11045:3-11. PMC: 7329239. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_1. View

11.

Li Y, Wu Y, Huang M, Zhang Y, Bai Z . Automatic prostate and peri-prostatic fat segmentation based on pyramid mechanism fusion network for T2-weighted MRI. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 223:106918. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106918. View

12.

Isensee F, Jaeger P, Kohl S, Petersen J, Maier-Hein K . nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods. 2020; 18(2):203-211. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z. View

13.

Litjens G, Toth R, Van de Ven W, Hoeks C, Kerkstra S, van Ginneken B . Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge. Med Image Anal. 2014; 18(2):359-73. PMC: 4137968. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002. View

14.

Lemaitre G, Marti R, Freixenet J, Vilanova J, Walker P, Meriaudeau F . Computer-Aided Detection and diagnosis for prostate cancer based on mono and multi-parametric MRI: a review. Comput Biol Med. 2015; 60:8-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.02.009. View

15.

Zabihollahy F, Schieda N, Jeyaraj S, Ukwatta E . Automated segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on T2-weighted (T2W) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map MR images using U-Nets. Med Phys. 2019; 46(7):3078-3090. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13550. View

16.

Grau V, Mewes A, Alcaniz M, Kikinis R, Warfield S . Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004; 23(4):447-58. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2004.824224. View

17.

Bergengren O, Pekala K, Matsoukas K, Fainberg J, Mungovan S, Bratt O . 2022 Update on Prostate Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2023; 84(2):191-206. PMC: 10851915. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.021. View

18.

James N, Tannock I, Ndow J, Feng F, Gillessen S, Ali S . The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases. Lancet. 2024; 403(10437):1683-1722. PMC: 7617369. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00651-2. View

19.

Chen L, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille A . DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017; 40(4):834-848. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184. View

20.

Chen X, Udupa J, Bagci U, Zhuge Y, Yao J . Medical image segmentation by combining graph cuts and oriented active appearance models. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012; 21(4):2035-46. PMC: 5548181. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2186306. View