» Articles » PMID: 39997323

Impact of Whole-Body Cryotherapy on Pain, Sleep Quality, Functional Status, and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis: A Comparative Study with Follow-Up

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2025 Feb 25
PMID 39997323
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whole-body cryotherapy (WBC) is widely recognized for its analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Despite growing interest in its therapeutic potential, the impact of WBC on functional performance, pain perception, sleep quality, and quality of life among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the effects of a 10-session WBC protocol on functional and psychological parameters in patients with MS and compare them with individuals without neurological disorders. A total of 73 participants divided into two groups, non-neurological individuals (non-MS, = 43) and patients with MS (MS, = 30), underwent 10 WBC sessions (-120 °C to -130 °C) over 2 weeks. Assessments included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30CST), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, with the WHOQOL-BREF conducted pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at a 10-day follow-up. In the MS group, significant improvements were observed post-treatment in the NRS, 30CST, WHOQOL-1, and PSQI. However, only the CST and WHOQOL-3 maintained improvements during follow-up. In the non-MS group, statistically significant improvements were observed post-treatment across most parameters, except for the NRS and WHOQOL-3, with most effects diminishing by the follow-up. No deterioration in any assessed parameters was observed in either group. WBC demonstrates potential benefits for managing MS symptoms, particularly pain and sleep quality, with no observed deterioration in parameters and some effects emerging only during follow-ups, underscoring its safety and the need for further research on long-term outcomes.

References
1.
Bowser B, ORourke S, Brown C, White L, Simpson K . Sit-to-stand biomechanics of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015; 30(8):788-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.06.012. View

2.
Kear B, Guck T, McGaha A . Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: Normative Reference Values for Ages 20 to 59 Years and Relationships With Physical and Mental Health Risk Factors. J Prim Care Community Health. 2016; 8(1):9-13. PMC: 5932649. DOI: 10.1177/2150131916659282. View

3.
Jerkovic A, Mikac U, Matijaca M, Kosta V, Curkovic Katic A, Dolic K . Psychometric Properties of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Factor Structure, Reliability, Correlates, and Discrimination. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(7). PMC: 8999563. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11072037. View

4.
Rzepka M, Chmiela T, Kaczmarczyk A, Krzystanek E . Insomnia, Fatigue, Bladder Disorders and Mood Disorders among Polish Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4). PMC: 10888699. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041043. View

5.
Thong I, Jensen M, Miro J, Tan G . The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?. Scand J Pain. 2018; 18(1):99-107. DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012. View