» Articles » PMID: 39996938

An In-Vitro Investigation into the Fracture Resistance of Prefabricated and Custom-Made Zirconia Crowns for Permanent Molars in Children

Overview
Journal Dent J (Basel)
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2025 Feb 25
PMID 39996938
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, the demand for esthetic restorations has grown dramatically and extended into the pediatric population. The prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) and custom-made zirconia crowns (CZCs) are new esthetic options in pediatric dentistry. However, they are still inadequately tested for use in children. Aim: To determine the fracture resistance and failure mode of the PZC in comparison to the CZC. In this in-vitro study, thirty cobalt-chromium dies were fabricated by scanning the negative replica of a prefabricated lower first permanent molar zirconia crown. CZCs were designed and milled using two different zirconia brands: Ceramill Zolid-FX (FX) and the Highly-Translucent (HT) zirconia. Dies were randomly assigned to receive either a PZC or a CZC (n = 10 in each group). All crowns were cemented on their respective dies using glass ionomer cement. Following artificial aging, all specimens were loaded to failure. Fracture mode analysis was performed. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test were used for multiple comparisons across the groups. The significant level was set at ≤ 0.05. HT zirconia had a significantly higher fracture load compared to other groups ( < 0.05). The mean fracture resistance values were: (3087 ± 385) N for HT zirconia, (2633 ± 300) N for PZCs, and (2483 ± 381) N for FX, with no statistically significant difference in fracture strengths between PZCs and FX. HT zirconia crowns showed the highest fracture resistance amongst all groups. The fracture loads of tested crowns exceeded the maximum posterior biteforce. When placed in permanent molars, PZC are expected to perform well under masticatory forces in children.

References
1.
Innes N, Ricketts D, Chong L, J Keightley A, Lamont T, Santamaria R . Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (12):CD005512. PMC: 7387869. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3. View

2.
Kongkiatkamon S, Rokaya D, Kengtanyakich S, Peampring C . Current classification of zirconia in dentistry: an updated review. PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15669. PMC: 10351515. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15669. View

3.
Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M . Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns. Dent Mater. 2015; 31(11):1363-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.154. View

4.
Elian El Hayek J, El Osta N, Farhat Mchayleh N . Fracture strength of preformed zirconia crown and new custom-made zirconia crown for the restoration of deciduous molars: in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022; 23(2):333-339. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-022-00691-0. View

5.
Owais A, Al-Battah A, Abu Alhaija E . Changes in occlusal bite force following placement of preformed metal crowns on primary molars in 4-6 years old children: a 6 months' follow-up pilot study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018; 20(1):9-14. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-018-0370-8. View