Neuromuscular Blocking Agents and Tracheal Intubation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effects on Laryngeal Complications and Intubating Conditions

Overview

Journal Health Sci Rep

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2025 Feb 25

PMID 39995794

Authors

Wanhong Li

Zhongyuan Lin

Fen Li

Kecheng Huang

Yunling Dou

Jieyu Fang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Aims: The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in tracheal intubation is widely accepted in anesthetic induction, but adverse effects are possible. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare influence of use and nonuse of NMBAs on incidence of laryngeal complications and intubating conditions in surgical patients.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials comparing use of NMBAs with either placebo or no treatment for oral tracheal intubation in adult patients under general anesthesia. Studies were evaluated using a risk-of-bias assessment. We conducted random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analyses on extracted data and calculated risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Nine trials with 1176 participants were included. Incidence of postoperative sore throat or hoarseness did not differ between groups receiving and not receiving NMBAs at 24 h (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.96-1.46; I = 45%), 48 h (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.46-1.52; I = 42%), or 72 h (RD: -0.00; 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.07; I = 59%). Compared with use of NMBAs, induction without NMBAs reduced the occurrence of acceptable intubating conditions (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94; I = 92%) and with increased risk for poor intubating conditions (RR: 4.77; 95% CI: 3.20-7.10; I = 0%). The pharmacological interventions for hemodynamic changes after intubation did not differ significantly between the NMBAs and non-NMBAs groups (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.53-1.95; I = 78%).

Conclusion: Endotracheal intubation without NMBAs does not increase the incidence of postoperative hoarseness or sore throat in adult surgical patients, which may be considered as a safe and effective technique of anesthesia induction. Although NMBAs use was associated with acceptable intubating conditions and reduced risk for poor intubation conditions.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021284813.

References

Mencke T, Echternach M, Kleinschmidt S, Lux P, Barth V, Plinkert P . Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98(5):1049-56. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00005. View

Sivalingam P, Kandasamy R, Dhakshinamoorthi P, Madhavan G . Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxant--a technique using sevoflurane vital capacity induction and alfentanil. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001; 29(4):383-7. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0102900409. View

Clergue F, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, Jougla E, Lienhart A, Laxenaire M . French survey of anesthesia in 1996. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91(5):1509-20. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00045. View

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T . Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:135. PMC: 4383202. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. View

Combes X, Schauvliege F, Peyrouset O, Motamed C, Kirov K, DHonneur G . Intracuff pressure and tracheal morbidity: influence of filling with saline during nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001; 95(5):1120-4. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00015. View

Nakanishi T, Yoshimura M, Sakamoto S, Toriumi T . Postoperative laryngeal morbidity and intubating conditions using the McGRATH™ MAC videolaryngoscope with or without neuromuscular blockade: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Anaesthesia. 2018; 73(8):990-996. DOI: 10.1111/anae.14303. View

Bouvet L, Stoian A, Jacquot-Laperriere S, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D, Boselli E . Laryngeal injuries and intubating conditions with or without muscular relaxation: an equivalence study. Can J Anaesth. 2008; 55(10):674-84. DOI: 10.1007/BF03017743. View

Empis de Vendin O, Schmartz D, Brunaud L, Fuchs-Buder T . Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring and Rocuronium: A Selective Sugammadex Reversal Protocol. World J Surg. 2017; 41(9):2298-2303. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4004-9. View

Marusch F, Hussock J, Haring G, Hachenberg T, Gastinger I . Influence of muscle relaxation on neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94(5):596-600. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei110. View

10.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2535. PMC: 2714657. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535. View

11.

Sadleir P, Clarke R, Bunning D, Platt P . Anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs: incidence and cross-reactivity in Western Australia from 2002 to 2011. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110(6):981-7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes506. View

12.

Lieutaud T, Billard V, Khalaf H, Debaene B . Muscle relaxation and increasing doses of propofol improve intubating conditions. Can J Anaesth. 2003; 50(2):121-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF03017842. View

13.

Jonsson Fagerlund M, Dabrowski M, Eriksson L . Pharmacological characteristics of the inhibition of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents at human adult muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Anesthesiology. 2009; 110(6):1244-52. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819fade3. View

14.

Gonzalez Obregon M, Rivera Diaz R, Ordonez Molina J, Rivera Diaz J, Velasquez Ossa L, Pineda Ibarra C . [Tracheal intubation quality under remifentanil-propofol with sevoflurane compared with remifentanil-propofol with rocuronium: a randomized double-blind clinical trial]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010; 57(6):351-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0034-9356(10)70247-4. View

15.

Combes X, Andriamifidy L, DuFresne E, Suen P, Sauvat S, Scherrer E . Comparison of two induction regimens using or not using muscle relaxant: impact on postoperative upper airway discomfort. Br J Anaesth. 2007; 99(2):276-81. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem147. View

16.

Erhan E, Ugur G, Alper I, Gunusen I, Ozyar B . Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003; 20(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021503000073. View

17.

Fortier L, McKeen D, Turner K, de Medicis E, Warriner B, Jones P . The RECITE Study: A Canadian Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesth Analg. 2015; 121(2):366-72. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000757. View

18.

McHardy F, Chung F . Postoperative sore throat: cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia. 2000; 54(5):444-53. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00780.x. View

19.

Thompson J, HALL A, Russell J, Cagney B, Rowbotham D . Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 80(4):467-9. DOI: 10.1093/bja/80.4.467. View

20.

Baillard C, Adnet F, Borron S, Racine S, Ait Kaci F, Fournier J . Tracheal intubation in routine practice with and without muscular relaxation: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005; 22(9):672-7. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021505001110. View