» Articles » PMID: 39994783

Improving Ways of Working with Researchers with Lived Expertise (of Homelessness)

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2025 Feb 25
PMID 39994783
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has become increasingly apparent that conducting rigorous, relevant and accepted research requires including Researchers with Lived Expertise/Experience (RWLE) in the research process. Including RWLE can create new knowledge rooted in new perspectives, and support research that is more relevant to affected populations. However, the conversation has primarily focused on how involving RWLE can improve research outcomes, so that inequities are being better addressed; there is very little focus on how involvement in research can and should benefit RWLE themselves, nor of how the research process itself can demonstrate a commitment to addressing inequities. In this commentary, we reflect on the experiences of two RWLE of Homelessness, and a Senior Research Associate who all worked together on a recent study. Informed by the challenges we faced and ways we navigated these, here we discuss key issues that must be given more consideration as involving RWLE becomes a necessary part of conducting research. Research teams must consider the issues of pay equity and job security for RLWE who often work on short-term contracts; supporting the professional development of RWLE for their own career advancement; and paying attention to the language we use and how we communicate research findings so they are accessible. There is a unique opportunity for research teams to incorporate a philosophical and practical orientation towards equity during the research process. While research seeks to understand and explain a phenomenon, it must simultaneously seek to address this very phenomenon through how the research is conducted. Our aim is to further the discussion around including RWLE, and to provide tangible suggestions for research organizations and teams.

References
1.
Gupta V, Eames C, Golding L, Greenhill B, Qi R, Allan S . Understanding the identity of lived experience researchers and providers: a conceptual framework and systematic narrative review. Res Involv Engagem. 2023; 9(1):26. PMC: 10127294. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00439-0. View

2.
Fletcher E, Gabrielian S, Brown L, Gough J, Ijadi-Maghsoodi R, Kalofonos I . Lessons Learned by Collaborating with Structurally Vulnerable Veterans via a Veterans Engagement Group. J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 37(Suppl 1):109-112. PMC: 8960678. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07075-y. View

3.
Wilson C, Janes G, Williams J . Identity, positionality and reflexivity: relevance and application to research paramedics. Br Paramed J. 2022; 7(2):43-49. PMC: 9662153. DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43. View

4.
Duncan A, Bell S, Salvatore A, Hellman C . Psychosocial factors associated with dispositional hope, agency thinking, and pathways thinking in a homeless adult population. J Community Psychol. 2022; 50(7):3196-3209. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22828. View

4.
Gee B, Nicholls H, Rivett S, Clarke T, Wilson J, Prothero L . 'Very hit and miss': an interpretive phenomenological analysis of ambulance service care for young people experiencing mental health crisis. Br Paramed J. 2022; 7(1):43-50. PMC: 9662145. DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2022.06.7.1.43. View