A Novel Cone Beam-CT Approach for Quantifying Maxillary Changes Following Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Unilateral Cleft Patients

Overview

Journal BMC Oral Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2025 Feb 23

PMID 39988685

Authors

Basel Khalil

Tobias Regnstrand

Reinhilde Jacobs

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify longitudinal bone changes in the maxilla after secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P), and to describe the maxillary dimensions before and after SABG in all orthogonal planes using a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-based methodology.

Methods: Ethical approval was obtained to retrospectively analyze CBCT scans of children treated for unilateral alveolar clefts. Inclusion criteria encompassed individuals who underwent SABG before the eruption of the cleft-side permanent lateral incisor or, if absent, the permanent ca-nine, and had both preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans. A total of seven measurements of maxillary dimensions in all orthogonal planes, as well as in panoramic reconstruction, were conducted in the CBCT images. The normality of the data was confirmed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. A paired t-test was applied to assess significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative measurements (p < 0.05). The impact of age, gender, and their interrelation was evaluated by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05).

Results: A total of 47 patients, comprising 32 males and 15 females, were selected based on the specified criteria. Notably, we observed a significant increase in sagittal, vertical, and transverse dimensions between the preoperative scans and those taken one year postoperatively (p < 0.05), irrespective of the patients' ages and genders. When considering gender, data indicated that male patients exhibited wider transverse dimensions in both the preoperative and postoperative measurements.

Conclusions: This study introduced a CBCT-based method to quantitatively assess maxillary changes in unilateral CL/P patients after SABG. The approach demonstrated continuous dimensional changes in all orthogonal planes. In addition, it described the maxillae dimensions in all planes. Future research can utilize this method for precise measurement of maxillary alterations and dimensions.

References

Hayashi I, Sakuda M, Takimoto K, Miyazaki T . Craniofacial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: a roentgeno-cephalometric study. Cleft Palate J. 1976; 13:215-37. View

Kadi H, Jacobs R, Shujaat S, Lemberger M, Benchimol D, Karsten A . A CBCT Based Assessment of Canine Eruption and Development Following Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients Born With Unilateral Cleft lip and/or Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021; 60(4):386-394. DOI: 10.1177/10556656211064477. View

Lin Y, Fu Z, Ma L, Li W . Cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalometric study of operated unilateral cleft lip and palate and noncleft children with Class III skeletal relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150(5):802-810. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.031. View

Shujaat S, Kesztyus A, Song D, Regnstrand T, Benchimol D, Nagy K . Moving toward patient specificity for devising cone-beam computed tomography field-of-views: A normative maxillary skeletal dimensional analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023; 33(5):477-486. DOI: 10.1111/ipd.13089. View

Lee C, Crepeau R, Williams H, Schwartz S . Alveolar cleft bone grafts: results and imprecisions of the dental radiograph. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96(7):1534-8. View

Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A . Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42(8):20120443. PMC: 3922261. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120443. View

Rosenstein S, Long Jr R, Dado D, Vinson B, Alder M . Comparison of 2-D calculations from periapical and occlusal radiographs versus 3-D calculations from CAT scans in determining bone support for cleft-adjacent teeth following early alveolar bone grafts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34(3):199-205. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0199_codcfp_2.3.co_2. View

Weissler E, Paine K, Ahmed M, Taub P . Alveolar Bone Grafting and Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138(6):1287-1295. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002778. View

Witherow H, Cox S, Jones E, Carr R, Waterhouse N . A new scale to assess radiographic success of secondary alveolar bone grafts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002; 39(3):255-60. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_2002_039_0255_anstar_2.0.co_2. View

10.

Brudnicki A, Sawicka E, Brudnicka R, Fudalej P . Effects of Different Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft on Craniofacial Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019; 57(1):105-113. DOI: 10.1177/1055665619866363. View

11.

Brattstrom V . Craniofacial development in cleft lip and palate children related to different treatment regimes. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl. 1991; 25:1-31. View

12.

Kannan P, Verma S, Kumar V, Verma R, Singh S . Effects of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on Maxillary Growth in Cleft Lip or Palate Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023; 61(11):1860-1872. DOI: 10.1177/10556656231188600. View

13.

Jabbari F, Wiklander L, Reiser E, Thor A, Hakelius M, Nowinski D . Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A 20-Year Follow-up. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018; 55(2):173-179. DOI: 10.1177/1055665617726999. View

14.

Mundra L, Lowe K, Khechoyan D . Alveolar Bone Graft Timing in Patients With Cleft Lip & Palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2021; 33(1):206-210. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007890. View

15.

Oenning A, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B . Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2017; 48(3):308-316. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9. View

16.

MOYERS R, Bookstein F . The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979; 75(6):599-617. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90093-9. View

17.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

18.

Boyne P, Sands N . Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. J Oral Surg. 1972; 30(2):87-92. View

19.

Lemberger M, Benchimol D, Pegelow M, Jacobs R, Karsten A . Validation and comparison of 2D grading scales and 3D volumetric measurements for outcome assessment of bone-grafted alveolar clefts in children. Eur J Orthod. 2024; 46(2). PMC: 10872128. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjae002. View

20.

Brudnicki A, Sawicka E, Brudnicka R, Fudalej P . Cephalometric comparison of early and late secondary bone grafting in the treatment of patients suffering from unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45(4):479-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.016. View